Jason Hunyar

Jason Hunyar is a Dunwoody, Georgia resident and open-records researcher who writes the newsletter "FOIA Around And Find Out," focused on Flock Safety's automated license-plate-reader cameras and government surveillance. His research has been cited by the Wall Street Journal, the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, The Intercept, and Forbes. He works in enterprise sales in the medtech/life-sciences industry.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Jason Hunyar on Privacy and U.S. Politics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Jason Hunyar

Jason Hunyar

Role at the time: Dunwoody, Georgia resident and privacy researcher who originally documented Flock's camera access through open-records requests and has previously spoken to the city council against its Flock contract

Condemned

Response to this claim

The sensitive searches run through the Flock City PD and related demo accounts, including for "Star of David" and "vehicle a pretty girl would drive," were internal tests of the company's search-moderation safeguards, not investigative searches conducted by a customer law enforcement agency.

“Flock's claims that they impose restrictions on what users can search for in their database provides the opposite assurance of what they seem to purport. In doing so, they admit that their dynamic surveillance network does in fact capture this sensitive information, and that the gate to that information is controlled solely by the policies of a for-profit corporation.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)'Flock City PD:' The Fake Flock-Owned 'Police Department' That Searched Real Cameras for Real People (404 Media)Full article, based on public-records audit logs; quotations from a Flock spokesperson and from Dunwoody resident Jason Hunyar
Why we used this label

Relative to whether Flock Safety's use of fake police accounts to search live license-plate cameras for sensitive queries was appropriate, Hunyar directly rejects Flock's defense, arguing the company's own explanation proves the sensitive-search capability exists and is controlled only by the company's own discretion, which condemns the arrangement rather than accepting Flock's justification.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.