Hamad Saif Al Shamsi

Counsellor Dr. Hamad Saif Al Shamsi is the Attorney-General of the United Arab Emirates and heads the Federal Public Prosecution. He was appointed the country's first attorney general by federal decree in 2014.

Also known as Hamad Saif Al-Shamsi, Hamad Saif al-Shamsi, UAE Attorney-GeneralWebsite (opens in a new tab)

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Hamad Saif Al Shamsi on Aviation Safety, International Relations, and Israel. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Hamad Saif Al Shamsi

Hamad Saif Al Shamsi

Role at the time: Attorney-General of the United Arab Emirates, in an update on the investigation carried by the state news agency WAM

Condemned

Statement summary

In an October 3, 2026 update on the investigation, the UAE Attorney-General, Hamad Saif Al Shamsi, said investigations had revealed that the co-pilot of flydubai flight FZ1073 attempted to carry out a terrorist act. He said the co-pilot began executing his plan during the flight, attacked the captain inside the flight deck with a crash axe and tried to take control of the aircraft's flight controls. He said investigations into the full circumstances, motives and any links were continuing and that final results would be announced when the procedures are complete.

“Investigations into the incident aboard Flydubai flight FZ1073 revealed that the co-pilot attempted to carry out a terrorist act”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Planning, attempted terrorist act behind flydubai flight FZ1073 incident: Attorney-General (WAM report, October 3, 2026) · Hamad Saif Al ShamsiFull report, paragraphs 1-4
Why we used this label

The case asks whether a pilot deliberately tried to crash FZ1073. The UAE, which leads the investigation, says through its Attorney-General that the co-pilot attempted a terrorist act, attacked the captain and tried to seize the flight controls, which affirms that the co-pilot acted deliberately against the flight. We labeled it Condemned, the label this case uses for speakers who assert the attempt. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, because he says motives and links are still under investigation, but that reservation concerns why he acted, not whether he did.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.