Eric Deters

Eric Deters is a Kentucky businessman, legal consultant and former lawyer who hosts a political talk show. He practiced law in Kentucky and Ohio for about 30 years, co-owned the Snappy Tomato Pizza restaurant chain and hosted morning radio in Ohio. He sought the Republican nomination for governor of Kentucky in 2023, ran for Congress in 2024 and organizes the Freedom Fest political events in northern Kentucky.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Eric Deters on Government Ethics and U.S. Politics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Eric Deters

Eric Deters

Role at the time: Kentucky businessman, retired lawyer and former Trump donor, in an interview on CNN's Anderson Cooper 360

Condemned

Response to this claim

Eric Deters owes Kimberly Guilfoyle about $150,000 for speeches and consulting work she performed before her nomination as ambassador, and her request for payment was an effort to collect that debt.

“I think what I've presented, she can't escape from, it's black and white, it's her own words. And I think she's toast as a result of it. It's grifting on the highest level and it's just an awful look for the administration. ... In all the text messages, she doesn't mention anything about me owing money. What she talks about is papering this. So, what she asked me to do was make up that I owed her money and write her a letter, and I did that for her. She knows that is phony, and I'm going to be suing him for defamation.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Anderson Cooper 360, October 12, 2026 (CNN transcript) · CNNGuilfoyle segment from the 20:15:34 marker: Trump clip, John Berman's interview with Eric Deters, then his interview with Jeff Flake
Why we used this label

The reference point is Eric Deters's allegation that Kimberly Guilfoyle, shortly before her July 2025 Senate confirmation hearing, asked him to pay her $100,000 American Express bill while offering to help him reach senior Trump administration officials. Condemned: Deters restates the allegation, calls it "grifting on the highest level" and rejects the lawyers' account that Guilfoyle was collecting a debt. The closest competing label is Denied; it loses because his denial concerns the lawyers' claim that he owed her money, while on the allegation itself he repeats and criticizes the conduct he describes.

Eric Deters

Role at the time: Kentucky businessman, retired lawyer and Trump donor, in an interview on PBS NewsHour

Condemned

Response to this claim

Kimberly Guilfoyle asked Eric Deters to pay her $100,000 American Express bill in July 2025 in exchange for helping him reach senior Trump administration officials.

“And she promised me that she would be my ride or die in the Trump administration, no request too big, too small, as many requests as I wanted. She would do anything and everything to help me. And she was -- she wanted to cover it up. She wanted to keep it secret. She wanted me to use Signal. She wanted me not to paper it. She got mad at me because I would send e-mails and text messages that she didn't want me to send. The bottom line was, is, it was a definite quid pro quo. That was what she was offering me.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)'It was a definite quid pro quo.' GOP donor who accused Guilfoyle of corruption speaks out · PBS NewsHourFull transcript; Deters's answer after Nawaz asks him to confirm that he considers the request a quid pro quo
Why we used this label

The reference point is Eric Deters's allegation that Kimberly Guilfoyle, shortly before her July 2025 Senate confirmation hearing, asked him to pay her $100,000 American Express bill while offering to help him reach senior Trump administration officials. Condemned: Deters makes the allegation himself, says Guilfoyle wanted the arrangement kept secret and calls it "a definite quid pro quo." The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because he attaches no condition or qualification to his account.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.