Loading record
Public disputes concerning political parties, public officials, institutions, political conduct, and governance in the United States.
Counts show individual statements. They do not assign an overall position.
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 14, 2026
2 matching statements. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 14, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 14, 2026
2 published statements. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 14, 2026
2 statements on this page. Dates: September 13, 2026 to September 14, 2026
Role at the time: Chief executive of xAI speaking at a conference
Statement summary
Musk proposed that leading AI labs, including Chinese firms, let rivals run a shared test harness on each other's models to evaluate safety.
“So, you know, instead of grading your own homework, you would at least have competitors grading your homework and raising the alarm if they see concerns,”
CNBC report of remarks Musk made at the All-In Summit in Los Angeles on Monday, September 14, 2026.
Musk supports external scrutiny but proposes it as an industry arrangement among competitors rather than a government-imposed safeguard, so this neither endorses nor rejects the case proposition.
Role at the time: Technology executive; statement posted from his verified X account.
Statement summary
Musk says Dario Amodei is right that AI should have some oversight and proposes peer review by competitors as a starting approach.
“Dario is right that there should be some oversight. Peer review of AI by competitors is the right way to start this off.”
Direct post from Musk responding to discussion of Dario Amodei’s AI-safety proposal. Musk supports some oversight and proposes peer review by competitors as an initial approach.
The post expressly supports oversight while limiting its proposed first step to competitor peer review; it does not state a full position on the scope of federal safeguards.
