Duncan Hames

Portrait of Duncan Hames
Keith Edkins (CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons)SourceCC BY-SA 3.0Downloaded at the original 1024 x 768 pixel size; no changes.

Duncan Hames is a British anti-corruption campaigner and former Liberal Democrat politician. He is director of policy and programmes at Transparency International UK and was the Member of Parliament for Chippenham from 2010 to 2015.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by Duncan Hames on Campaign Finance and U.K. Politics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Statements by Duncan Hames

Portrait of Duncan Hames

Duncan Hames

Role at the time: Director of policy and programmes at Transparency International UK

Condemned

Statement summary

Hames, of Transparency International UK, called the two pledges a watershed moment, said the situation was completely out of control, and said it made an irrefutable case for an annual cap on political donations.

“This is a watershed moment, with two billionaires pledging £72m to one political party in less than 48 hours. ... This situation is now completely out of control, and makes an irrefutable case for government to bring forward an annual cap on political donations, and fast.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Reform receives second £36m donation in two days as crypto investor matches record · BBCFull article; reactions from Labour, the Green Party, the Liberal Democrats and Transparency International UK near the end
Why we used this label

The reference point is Reform UK's acceptance of the two 36 million pound donations from Ben Delo and Christopher Harborne in September 2026. Condemned: Hames presents the two donations as a sign that the situation is completely out of control and as proof that a cap is needed, which criticizes the donations rather than only the rules around them. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because no part of his remark accepts the donations or makes his criticism depend on a condition.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.