David Brooks

Portrait of David Brooks
Jay Godwin / LBJ LibrarySourcePublic domainExisting portrait crop retained; resized only.

Author and political and cultural commentator whose work examines character, society, and public life.

What DI has documented

DI has documented statements by David Brooks on 2026 Midterm Elections, Antisemitism, and Criminal Justice Policy, among other topics. Read the quotations, original sources and related cases below.

Topics in this coverage

Show all 7 topics

Statements by David Brooks

Portrait of David Brooks

David Brooks

Role at the time: Columnist for The Atlantic, speaking as a PBS News Hour political analyst

Condemned

Statement summary

On PBS News Hour, David Brooks said Ossoff should stop calling political opponents Nazis, but said it is accurate that Collins has a disturbing number of young men around him with ties to the alt-right and antisemitic content online.

“Jon Ossoff, my advice to him is, if you start calling your political opponents Nazis, maybe it's time to shut up. That's just not what we do here in this country. And the Bull Connor stuff -- and a lot of these candidates have real weaknesses. Like, Mike Collins, who's the Georgia Republican, I think what's accurate to say about him is, he has a disturbing number of young men on his -- around him who have ties to the alt-right and some of the vile antisemitic stuff online.”
Watch the original video (opens in a new tab)Brooks and Capehart on the fight for Senate control in battleground statesTranscript, Brooks's first answer, passage beginning: Some, I agree with Jonathan
Why we used this label

Relative to Collins's staffing and associations as Ossoff described them, Brooks says it is accurate that Collins has "a disturbing number of young men" around him with ties to the alt-right and antisemitic content online, which condemns those associations. He also tells Ossoff to stop calling political opponents Nazis. That criticism is aimed at Ossoff's rhetoric and does not defend Collins's hiring, so it does not change the label.

Portrait of David Brooks

David Brooks

Role at the time: Writer and PBS NewsHour political analyst

Condemned

Statement summary

Brooks condemns Hegseth's plan to broadcast the execution. He argues that watching public executions dehumanizes spectators and reverses moral progress away from public displays of suffering.

“And so what Hegseth is doing is just -- is amoral beyond -- beyond reckoning.”
Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)David Brooks and Jonathan Capehart discuss the Hasan execution livestream on PBS NewsHour · PBS NewsHourOctober 9, 2026, 14:15 clip; Transcript tab, final topic beginning with Nawaz's question about Hegseth, followed by Capehart and then Brooks.
Why we used this label

The case asks whether Pete Hegseth should livestream Nidal Hasan's execution; it concerns the broadcast proposal, not Hasan's conviction or capital punishment. Brooks calls what Hegseth is doing "amoral beyond -- beyond reckoning" and argues that watching public executions dehumanizes spectators. That opposes the broadcast, so we labeled it Condemned. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional; it loses because he offers no support for the plan.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.