Cait Conley

Democratic candidate for New York's 17th Congressional District and a U.S. Army veteran.

Case

Should Pete Hegseth be impeached?

Congressional impeachment proposals against Pete Hegseth cite military operations, oversight, and Signal. Supporters say the allegations warrant removal; Hegseth disputed the description that anyone was “texting war plans,” and a Pentagon spokesperson called Ansari’s April impeachment effort a “charade.”

U.S. PoliticsMilitary and DefenseUpdated

Statements by Cait Conley

Cait Conley

Role at the time: Democratic candidate for New York’s 17th Congressional District; U.S. Army veteran

Condemned

Statement summary

Asked on CNN whether she would support impeaching Hegseth if elected, congressional candidate Cait Conley said she would support removing him from office and confirmed on a follow-up that she meant articles of impeachment.

I believe he has been a hazard to American national security and a disgrace to the office. I would absolutely support removing him from office, because his actions and decisions are failing service members who have sworn an oath to this country and deserve respect, and for politicians to actually value their lives and their willingness to make the ultimate sacrifice, instead of thinking that it’s a game or some movie, like Hegseth continuously talks about.
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)CNN State of the Union transcript, September 6, 2026 — interview with Cait ConleyConley interview segment; Bash question on impeachment and Conley’s answer and follow-up confirmation.
Why we used this label

Relative to whether the House should impeach Hegseth, Conley answers an express impeachment question by supporting removal, and confirms when pressed that this means supporting articles of impeachment. The condition in the question concerns her own election, not the merits.

Topics in this coverage