Bob Yancy

Bob Yancy is a College Station, Texas, city councilmember for Place 5, first elected in November 2022 and re-elected in November 2024. He founded MEMdata and was its chief executive. He has also chaired local hospital boards and worked in real-estate investment. He is a candidate for mayor in the November 3, 2026 election.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Bob Yancy, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Bob Yancy

Bob Yancy

Role at the time: College Station City Councilmember, Texas

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

Councilman Bob Yancy voted against renewing College Station's Flock contract, saying the problem is the vendor's design and the company rather than the technology, and KBTX reports he urged the city to switch to Axon or a similar provider.

“The problem is not the technology. The problem is the vendor's open architecture, their initial lack of concern for privacy in its initial design, and the company itself.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)College Station City Council Votes 4-2 to Renew Contract With Flock SafetyParagraphs quoting Councilmembers Yancy, Smith, McIlhaney and Shafer
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Yancy voted against renewal and says "The problem is not the technology" but the vendor's open architecture, and KBTX reports he urged the city to switch to Axon or a similar provider. Opposing Flock while accepting plate-reader technology from another vendor fits Mixed or conditional, placed at Ban on the remedy ladder because he would end the city's Flock use. The closest competing label is Condemned, which would fit a rejection of the networks themselves; he rejects the vendor instead.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage