Antanette Mosley

Antanette Mosley is the vice mayor of Asheville, North Carolina, and an attorney. She was appointed to the Asheville City Council in 2020, elected in 2022, and is seeking reelection in the November 2026 election. Her council work includes the Housing and Community Development Committee and the Boards and Commissions Committee. Her liaison assignments include the Housing Authority and the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee.

OfficeholderAlso known as S. Antanette MosleyWebsite (opens in a new tab)

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Antanette Mosley, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Keep up with who wants to ban, limit or keep Flock cameras

Get an email if a candidate or official takes a new position on plate-reader networks, or if a city, legislature or court acts on them.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Antanette Mosley

Antanette Mosley

Role at the time: Vice mayor of Asheville (North Carolina), running for reelection to City Council

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

At the Asheville City Council's August 25, 2026 meeting, Vice Mayor Antanette Mosley said she has concerns about Flock, including privacy, data sharing, civil liberties and accountability, and that she supports carefully regulated public-safety tools that are effective, necessary and accompanied by safeguards. She said the resolution may end a contract but does not settle the larger questions about license-plate readers, and that she could not support it in its current form. She voted no.

“I want to be clear that I have concerns about Flock. I have concerns about privacy, data sharing, civil liberties, and accountability. ... I support carefully regulated public-safety tools when they are effective, necessary, and accompanied by meaningful safeguards and accountability. ... this resolution may terminate a contract, but it does not resolve the larger issue before us. ... I cannot support this resolution in its current form tonight.”
Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Minutes for August 25, 2026, City Council MeetingRegular Formal Meeting, 5:00 p.m., section VI (New Business), item A: Resolution 26-180, Resolution Book No. 46, Page 454. Remarks by Roney, Mosley, Smith, Turner, Hess, Ullman and Manheimer, then the 5-2 vote.
Why we used this label

The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Mosley voiced concerns about Flock, said she supports carefully regulated public-safety tools that are effective and necessary, and voted against ending the contract. Backing regulated use with safeguards rather than ending it fits Mixed or conditional, and we placed it at Guardrails on the remedy ladder. The closest competing label is Defended or excused, which would fit a defense of current use; she raised concerns about Flock itself.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage