Anders Lomholt

Anders Lomholt is the defense correspondent (forsvarskorrespondent) of the Danish broadcaster TV 2, a post he has held since May 2022. He has worked as a journalist since 1998.

What we have documented

We have documented 1 statement by Anders Lomholt, in 1 case. Each statement below gives the quotation, its original source and a link to the full case.

Case updates

Next steps for the Greenland deal Trump called 'permanent control'

Get an email if Denmark's and Greenland's parliaments act on the agreement, or if officials dispute or repeat Trump's 'permanent control' description.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Statements by Anders Lomholt

Anders Lomholt

Role at the time: Defense correspondent at TV 2 (Denmark), in a signed 'Lynanalyse' (flash analysis) entry in TV 2's live blog 'Kampen om Grønlands fremtid'

Mixed or conditional

Statement summary

TV 2 defense correspondent Anders Lomholt wrote, in a signed flash analysis in the outlet's live blog, that reaching an agreement looks on its face like a big win for diplomacy but depends entirely on the agreement's actual content. He added that if it goes as far as Trump suggests it would in several respects resemble a ceding of sovereignty, citing a possible U.S. veto over who may have a military presence in Greenland. The quotation is a translation from Danish.

“But it depends entirely on the agreement's actual content. If it goes as far as Trump suggests, it looks in several respects like a ceding of sovereignty.”
Open source (opens in a new tab)Kampen om Grønlands fremtid (live blog), entry 'Lynanalyse' by Anders Lomholt, 00.04 · TV 2Entry 'Lynanalyse' (flash analysis) signed 'Anders Lomholt, Forsvarskorrespondent, TV 2', timestamp Kl. 00.04 Copenhagen time on 19 Sept 2026 (22:04:33Z, i.e. 6:04 PM EDT on 18 Sept); permalink ?entry=ea5c29fb-1b77-4881-8e61-d929906db0f1; quoted text is the second sentence of paragraph 1 and the first sentence of paragraph 2.
Why we used this label

Lomholt says reaching an agreement looks on its face like a big diplomatic win, that this depends entirely on its actual content, and that if it goes as far as Trump suggests it would in several respects resemble a ceding of sovereignty; he neither accepts nor rejects Trump's description and says the answer awaits the text. The closest competing label is condemns, because he calls the version Trump suggests, if accurate, a ceding of sovereignty. That loses because the criticism is expressly conditional, sits beside his description of the agreement as possibly a big win for diplomacy, and he closes by saying the outcome cannot be known until the agreement becomes a reality.

A participant is a subject of the case. A speaker has a statement documented in it. A commentator has an opinion or editorial documented in it.

Topics in this coverage