Andrew Egger calls the mail-in restrictions a "ridiculous" scheme
Andrew EggerWhite House reporter, The Bulwark
Andrew Egger called the mail-in voting restrictions a "ridiculous" scheme and welcomed the Supreme Court blocking them.
“Last night's Supreme Court decision blocking Trump's ridiculous anti-mail-in ballots scheme was a massive rebuke of the president... The bastards couldn't manage to pull this one off.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?
USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
The Bulwark's Morning Shots newsletter, Andrew Egger, on the SCOTUS mail-in ballot ruling.
Before the quotation
Written in the September 15, 2026 edition of The Bulwark's Morning Shots newsletter.
After the quotation
Published as part of The Bulwark's Morning Shots newsletter roundup.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Egger calls the restrictions a "ridiculous" scheme and celebrates the Supreme Court blocking it as a "massive rebuke," an express condemnation.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Donald Trump
More from this case
Read the full casePritzker says Illinois sued over Trump's mail-voting threat and won
“That's why we added polling locations statewide, and when Donald Trump threatened mail-in voting, we took him to court—and won.”Read statement
Kate Starbird says the administration's mail-voting push sowed doubt and confusion
“The bad news: The Trump admin's efforts to interfere w/ mail-in-voting were successful in sowing doubt & confusion. The good news: That's not stopping voters who are getting the message to vote early, use official ballot dropboxes, & track their ballots.”Read statement
Shapiro says Trump tried to limit Pennsylvanians' mail-in voting
“Donald Trump tried to prevent Pennsylvania voters from making their voices heard in this election by attempting to limit mail-in voting.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Andrew Egger calls the mail-in restrictions a "ridiculous" scheme
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/925-andrew-egger-called-the-mail-in-voting-restrictions
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Andrew Egger calls the mail-in restrictions a "ridiculous" scheme". First published: 2026-09-17. Last updated: 2026-09-17. https://disputeindex.com/events/925-andrew-egger-called-the-mail-in-voting-restrictions