Center for Biological Diversity calls the order a horrific decision that clears the way to bulldoze Big Bend

Center for Biological DiversityEnvironmental group and plaintiff, in a statement by national public lands advocate Laiken Jordahl

Condemned

Laiken Jordahl of the Center for Biological Diversity, a plaintiff, says the administration and its contractors are bent on destroying a national park and that the order lets them bulldoze desert and dynamite canyon walls before the courts decide whether the work is legal.

“The Trump administration and its contractors are hellbent on destroying one of America’s greatest national parks, and the Supreme Court just gave them the green light ... This horrific decision clears the way for contractors to bulldoze pristine desert and dynamite canyon walls before the courts have even decided whether this destruction is legal.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Supreme Court Clears Way for Border Wall Construction Across Big Bend · Center for Biological DiversityPress release text

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)AP: Supreme Court allows Trump administration to resume building border wall in Texas's Big Bend · Associated PressArticle text

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Sheer rock walls of Santa Elena Canyon rise on both sides of the Rio Grande under a clear blue sky, with three canoes on the river and green brush along the right bank.
Credit: Carol M. Highsmith / Library of Congress

Where this statement fits

Supreme Court lets border construction resume in Texas's Big Bend while a waiver lawsuit continues; the Center for Biological Diversity condemns the order, and DHS's top lawyer welcomes it

On November 9, 2026, the Supreme Court granted the federal government's request to pause a preliminary injunction that had blocked border barrier and road construction in the Big Bend Sector of Texas, which includes Big Bend National Park. In an unsigned opinion in Mullin v. Friends of the Ruidosa Church, the Court said the government was very likely to win its argument that the district court lacked jurisdiction over the challengers' major-questions claim, because the 1996 law that lets the Homeland Security secretary waive legal requirements for border construction allows courts to hear only constitutional claims. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson would have denied the request. The challengers are the Center for Biological Diversity, Friends of the Ruidosa Church and a Big Bend-area river guide and landowner. The Center called the order horrific and said it clears the way to bulldoze desert and blast canyon walls before the courts decide whether the work is legal. DHS general counsel James Percival welcomed what he called an 8-1 win. The order pauses the injunction while the government seeks further review and does not decide the lawsuit.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Supreme Court Clears Way for Border Wall Construction Across Big Bend (opens in a new tab) · Center for Biological DiversityPress release text

About this source

Release of November 9, 2026 by the Center for Biological Diversity, one of the plaintiffs, with statements by Laiken Jordahl and the group's account of construction in Big Bend National Park since August.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

AP: Supreme Court allows Trump administration to resume building border wall in Texas's Big Bend (opens in a new tab) · Associated PressArticle text

About this source

Associated Press report of November 9, 2026, published by WBTV, on the Supreme Court's order and reactions from the Center for Biological Diversity, a Big Bend landowner and Sen. John Cornyn's op-ed.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The Center for Biological Diversity is one of the plaintiffs whose lawsuit led to the October 2 injunction that the Supreme Court paused.

After the quotation

Jordahl says the administration is signing off on the permanent destruction of the wildest place in Texas and the theft of a great American river.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the federal government's border barrier and road construction in Texas's Big Bend region under DHS waivers of environmental laws, which the Supreme Court allowed to resume on November 9, 2026. The Center calls the order horrific and the construction destruction of a national park, which condemns it.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Center for Biological Diversity, Center for Biological Diversity calls the order a horrific decision that clears the way to bulldoze Big BendDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Center for Biological Diversity calls the order a horrific decision that clears the way to bulldoze Big Bend
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8692-laiken-jordahl-of-the-center-for-biological-diversity

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Center for Biological Diversity calls the order a horrific decision that clears the way to bulldoze Big Bend". First published: 2026-11-12. Last updated: 2026-11-12. https://disputeindex.com/events/8692-laiken-jordahl-of-the-center-for-biological-diversity