Labrador calls secret driver-data sales a breach of trust

Raúl LabradorIdaho attorney general, speaking in an official release

Condemned

Labrador condemns secret collection and sale as a breach of trust. He also criticizes incentives for dealers to enroll buyers without their knowledge.

“Secretly collecting and selling driver data was an unacceptable breach of trust with GM’s customers”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Raúl Labrador comments on the GM driver-data settlementRaúl Labrador quotation block

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Illuminated Renaissance Center towers in Detroit with a General Motors sign.
Credit: BriYYZ / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

Where this statement fits

GM says its terms allowed driver-data sharing; consumers dispute consent.

GM and OnStar argue that their user terms and privacy statement permitted collecting and sharing driving data. Consumers in federal litigation say the collection exceeded their authorization. On April 22, 2026, a federal judge allowed the contract claim to proceed while dismissing some other claims. On October 29, Michigan announced a $220 million settlement reached by a coalition of 36 attorneys general. Attorney General Dana Nessel condemned tracking and selling driving data without consent. The consent judgment is stipulated without admission of facts or liability. Michigan says it provides no consumer restitution and that a nationwide private class action remains pending.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Raúl Labrador comments on the GM driver-data settlement (opens in a new tab)Raúl Labrador quotation block

About this source

The Idaho attorney general gives an individual statement about the multistate settlement and the alleged Smart Driver practices. The release describes the states' allegations and agreed safeguards.

Before the quotation

His office announces the multistate settlement of contested data-sharing allegations.

After the quotation

The release describes consent requirements and future privacy safeguards agreed with GM.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is GM's disputed collection and sharing of Smart Driver data without informed consent. Labrador condemns those practices.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Raúl Labrador, Labrador calls secret driver-data sales a breach of trustDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Labrador calls secret driver-data sales a breach of trust
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/8145-labrador-condemns-secret-collection-and-sale-as-a

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Labrador calls secret driver-data sales a breach of trust". First published: 2026-11-04. Last updated: 2026-11-04. https://disputeindex.com/events/8145-labrador-condemns-secret-collection-and-sale-as-a