Rayfield says GM sold data despite its promise
Dan RayfieldOregon attorney general, speaking in an official release
Rayfield says GM broke its promise about insurance-related sharing. He argues that the settlement restores drivers' control over their information.
“Our investigation found GM sold that data anyway, and some drivers paid for it with higher premiums.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
GM says its terms allowed driver-data sharing; consumers dispute consent.
GM and OnStar argue that their user terms and privacy statement permitted collecting and sharing driving data. Consumers in federal litigation say the collection exceeded their authorization. On April 22, 2026, a federal judge allowed the contract claim to proceed while dismissing some other claims. On October 29, Michigan announced a $220 million settlement reached by a coalition of 36 attorneys general. Attorney General Dana Nessel condemned tracking and selling driving data without consent. The consent judgment is stipulated without admission of facts or liability. Michigan says it provides no consumer restitution and that a nationwide private class action remains pending.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
The Oregon attorney general gives an individual statement about the multistate settlement and the alleged Smart Driver practices. The release describes the states' allegations and agreed safeguards.
Before the quotation
His office announces the multistate settlement of contested data-sharing allegations.
After the quotation
The release describes consent requirements and future privacy safeguards agreed with GM.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is GM's disputed collection and sharing of Smart Driver data without informed consent. Rayfield condemns those practices.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseLabrador calls secret driver-data sales a breach of trust
“Secretly collecting and selling driver data was an unacceptable breach of trust with GM’s customers”Read statement
Jennings criticizes deception and backs stronger privacy enforcement
“Today’s settlement ensures that GM won’t deceive consumers about its data practices in the future.”Read statement
Ellison calls secret driving-data collection egregious
“This is egregious behavior and I’m proud to have helped this bipartisan coalition put a stop to it”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Rayfield says GM sold data despite its promise
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/8142-rayfield-says-gm-broke-its-promise-about-insurance
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Rayfield says GM sold data despite its promise". First published: 2026-11-04. Last updated: 2026-11-04. https://disputeindex.com/events/8142-rayfield-says-gm-broke-its-promise-about-insurance