CAIR and CAIR-Florida say FDLE's notice fails Florida's terrorism criteria.

Council on American-Islamic RelationsCAIR, jointly with CAIR-Florida, through counsel's written objection to FDLE

Condemned

CAIR and CAIR-Florida object to the proposed designations, saying FDLE has not shown terrorist activity or an ongoing security threat.

“nothing in the Notice of Intent meets the definition of “terrorist activity” under Florida law.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)FDLE Cabinet package contains CAIR designation notice and written objectionsSeptember 29, 2026 Cabinet materials, updated September 28; PDF pp. 10-16 (notice), 255-260 (objection), 262-427 (attached earlier litigation materials).

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Council on American-Islamic Relations in this case

The historic Florida Capitol with the modern Capitol tower behind it in Tallahassee.
Credit: Civil10 / Wikimedia Commons (CC0)

Where this statement fits

Florida designates CAIR a domestic terrorist organization; CAIR challenges the label.

Florida's governor and Cabinet approved the designation of CAIR, including CAIR-Florida, as a domestic terrorist organization on September 29, 2026. An October 6 notice set the designation to take effect 30 days after publication, on November 5. The groups challenge the statutory designation under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and as preempted by federal law. FDLE's notice cites historical Holy Land Foundation materials, foreign designations and Senate testimony. It asserts that CAIR, including its Florida chapter, engages in terrorist activity and poses an ongoing threat. CAIR's September 25 written objection disputes those assertions and the adequacy of the process. The state's defendants defend the designation as an administrative measure targeting conduct. CAIR and CAIR-Florida's October 16 reply and sworn declarations deny terrorist activity and challenge the state's arguments. On October 6, Judge Mark Walker denied an immediate temporary restraining order because the November 5 effective date left time to hear both sides. After the case was reassigned, Chief Judge Allen Winsor heard the preliminary-injunction request on October 28. On November 4 he declined to order the designations removed, finding the groups unlikely to succeed on most claims, including their due process and prior-restraint claims. He wrote that whether the groups are in fact terrorist organizations was not the question at that stage. He barred the Attorney General and State Attorneys from enforcing the material-support law over legal services provided to the groups, whether against the groups and their employees or against the people providing those services. That bar required a $1,000 bond, and the groups' counsel filed notice of it on November 6. The designations took effect on November 5. That day the groups filed a notice of appeal to the Eleventh Circuit, and their counsel said CAIR and CAIR-Florida were shutting down advocacy and operations in Florida.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

FDLE Cabinet package contains CAIR designation notice and written objections (opens in a new tab)September 29, 2026 Cabinet materials, updated September 28; PDF pp. 10-16 (notice), 255-260 (objection), 262-427 (attached earlier litigation materials).

About this source

FDLE recommends designation. CAIR and CAIR-Florida's September 25 objection disputes the factual basis and process and incorporates materials from earlier litigation.

Before the quotation

FDLE's notice names CAIR, including CAIR-Florida. The organizations say they received it on September 18.

After the quotation

Their lawyers argue that the process violates due process and the First Amendment. The Governor and Cabinet approved the designation on September 29.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to Florida's proposed designations, the joint objection rejects their statutory basis and calls the process unconstitutional. This criticizes the state action itself, beyond disputing a description of the organizations.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR and CAIR-Florida say FDLE's notice fails Florida's terrorism criteria.Download image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
CAIR and CAIR-Florida say FDLE's notice fails Florida's terrorism criteria.
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7839-cair-and-cair-florida-object-to-the-proposed

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "CAIR and CAIR-Florida say FDLE's notice fails Florida's terrorism criteria.". First published: 2026-11-09. Last updated: 2026-11-09. https://disputeindex.com/events/7839-cair-and-cair-florida-object-to-the-proposed