Brennan condemns the newspaper-page deletions as censorship

William J. Brennan Jr.U.S. Supreme Court justice, dissenting with Justices Marshall and Blackmun

Condemned

Brennan argues that the principal violated students' speech rights and that the deletion was insufficiently tailored.

“He violated the First Amendment's prohibitions against censorship of any student expression that neither disrupts classwork nor invades the rights of others, and against any censorship that is not narrowly tailored to serve its purpose.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260Official U.S. Reports, pp. 260-291; majority and dissent

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Portrait of William J. Brennan Jr.
Credit: Robert S. Oakes / Library of Congress

Where this statement fits

Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier: school defends deleting newspaper pages; student journalists challenge the decision

The Supreme Court split over a principal's removal of pages from a school-sponsored newspaper. The majority accepted the decision as reasonably related to educational concerns. The dissent called the deletion unconstitutional censorship.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (opens in a new tab)Official U.S. Reports, pp. 260-291; majority and dissent

About this source

The Supreme Court considers a principal's deletion of pages from a curricular high-school newspaper. The opinion expressly reserves the question of comparable deference at universities.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Brennan disputes the majority's standard for school-sponsored student expression.

After the quotation

His dissent challenges the scope of the deletion as well as the rule permitting it.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Brennan condemns the censorship challenged in the case.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: William J. Brennan Jr., Brennan condemns the newspaper-page deletions as censorshipDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Brennan condemns the newspaper-page deletions as censorship
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7678-brennan-argues-that-the-principal-violated-students-speech

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Brennan condemns the newspaper-page deletions as censorship". First published: 2026-11-02. Last updated: 2026-11-02. https://disputeindex.com/events/7678-brennan-argues-that-the-principal-violated-students-speech