Powell defends the broadcast as routine news coverage

Lewis F. Powell Jr.U.S. Supreme Court justice, dissenting with Justices Brennan and Marshall

Defended or excused

Powell argues that routine news use should be protected unless it is a cover for exploitation.

“When a film is used, as here, for a routine portion of a regular news program, I would hold that the First Amendment protects the station from a "right of publicity" or "appropriation" suit, absent a strong showing by the plaintiff that the news broadcast was a subterfuge or cover for private or commercial exploitation.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562Official U.S. Reports, pp. 562-583; majority and both dissents

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Portrait of Byron R. White
Credit: Robert S. Oakes / Library of Congress

Where this statement fits

Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard: performer challenges broadcast of his entire act; broadcaster claims press protection

The Supreme Court split over a station's broadcast of Hugo Zacchini's entire act without consent. The majority rejected constitutional immunity while leaving state-law protection open; Powell's dissent argued for First Amendment protection of routine news use.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co., 433 U.S. 562 (opens in a new tab)Official U.S. Reports, pp. 562-583; majority and both dissents

About this source

The Supreme Court considers a news broadcast of an entire human-cannonball act. The opinions include the broadcast script and the competing constitutional arguments.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Powell warns about discouraging news coverage and emphasizes the use of footage in a regular news program.

After the quotation

He distinguishes appropriation suits from other privacy torts and would protect bona fide news use.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Powell defends the news broadcast challenged in the case.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Lewis F. Powell Jr., Powell defends the broadcast as routine news coverageDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Powell defends the broadcast as routine news coverage
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7676-powell-argues-that-routine-news-use-should-be

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Powell defends the broadcast as routine news coverage". First published: 2026-11-02. Last updated: 2026-11-02. https://disputeindex.com/events/7676-powell-argues-that-routine-news-use-should-be