Elicker says DOJ monitors at New Haven polls would be counterproductive
Justin ElickerMayor of New Haven, in a city statement
Elicker says that, given Trump's attempts to cast doubt on elections and the politicization of DOJ, posting federal monitors at polling places would make them feel less accessible.
“Given President Trump’s repeated attempts to undermine and cast doubt on free and fair elections across the nation and given the politicization of the Department of Justice under the Trump Administration, we believe posting federal election monitors at polling places would be counterproductive and make our polling places feel less accessible.”
Reporting
Reporting
Where this statement fits
Should DOJ send election monitors to all 50 states?
Attorney General Todd Blanche says DOJ will send election monitors to every state for the 2026 midterms. Harmeet Dhillon describes trained legal professionals observing and documenting voting. The NAACP argues that the expanded deployment risks intimidation and lacks a clear public explanation of its authority. Its October 2 lawsuit seeks records about the program, including personnel, training, locations and state consent.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
WFSB publishes the statement from Mayor Justin Elicker and the registrars of voters on DOJ's planned monitors.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Reporting
About this source
CT Insider reports on DOJ's email announcing monitors for New Haven and the registrars' reply, based on correspondence it obtained.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
DOJ tells New Haven that it will send monitors to observe the election. Elicker says voting is the most precious right in a democracy and that the city and both registrars want every eligible voter to vote freely and without intimidation or interference.
After the quotation
He says the registrars will remind poll moderators of Connecticut's rules for poll watchers, and urges New Haven residents to vote.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The case asks whether DOJ should send monitors to all 50 states. Elicker opposes posting federal monitors at New Haven polling places, citing the president's attacks on elections and the department's politicization.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseDaugherty calls DOJ's monitor deployment common sense
“That's common sense. Why would ANY Democrat state not want someone making sure the votes are fair?”Read statement
Elias disputes DOJ's claim that its monitoring plan is standard
“A top official has denied that DOJ’s plan to deploy 1,000 election monitors is any different from its practices during past races — despite the Trump administration currently bringing unprecedented and baseless lawsuits to intimidate election officials.”Read statement
NAACP says DOJ's declaration shows law enforcement staff will be monitors this year
NAACP
“The DOJ confirmed that, in contrast to previous elections, personnel from law enforcement agencies will be part of the DOJ monitoring this Election Day.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Elicker says DOJ monitors at New Haven polls would be counterproductive
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/7627-elicker-says-that-given-trump-s-attempts-to
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Elicker says DOJ monitors at New Haven polls would be counterproductive". First published: 2026-11-01. Last updated: 2026-11-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/7627-elicker-says-that-given-trump-s-attempts-to