Thom Tillis says industry should self-regulate first and Congress could then codify it

Retiring United States senator speaking to reporters

I think the industry needs to get a kind of Manhattan Project going, figure out what they need to do to self-regulate, and then what they need in order to enable them to have a consequence if people fall outside of those regulations. … We could codify some of them,
Open source (opens in a new tab)AI threats confront a Congress far from erecting guardrailsCongressional reaction round-up quoting Johnson, Thune, Barrasso, Cruz, Tillis and Cantwell.

Source and context

Reporting

AI threats confront a Congress far from erecting guardrails (opens in a new tab)Congressional reaction round-up quoting Johnson, Thune, Barrasso, Cruz, Tillis and Cantwell.

About this source

Roll Call report posted 6:23pm on September 15, 2026 and updated at 9:36pm. Reports that neither party has coalesced around a legislative plan and that action before the midterms looks unlikely.

Before the quotation

Roll Call reports that Republicans have emphasised the need for industry involvement in any federal standard, and that Tillis pushed back on the hoax framing used by Trump.

After the quotation

Roll Call also reports that AI regulation was not discussed in depth at the Republican policy luncheon that day. The ellipsis inside the quotation is Roll Call's own, not an editorial cut.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

Case context: Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?

The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.

Why this label?

Tillis neither endorses nor rejects the case proposition. He pushes back on the hoax framing and allows that Congress could codify rules, while insisting the sequence must start with industry. That conditional support is why this is mixed rather than a defense or a rejection.

Recorded on
Published here
Illustration of the U.S. Capitol framed by an abstract AI network and transparent protective dome
Credit: The Dispute Index

Should Washington impose stronger safeguards on frontier AI?

Explore the case context, sources and public responses.

Read the full case

More from this case

Read the full case

JD Vance

If you're gonna create Frankenstein, don't come to the government and say we need regulation... Look inward and accept that if you're building Frankenstein, No 1, you should stop and No 2, when companies come to you and say: 'We need the tools to fight back against Frankenstein,' give them those tools.
Read statement

Kathy Hochul

Donald Trump made AI safety voluntary. In New York, accountability isn’t optional. We’re requiring the biggest AI companies to disclose their safety protocols, report serious incidents, and answer when things go wrong.
Read statement

Chris Lehane

specifically talked about how we think about IVO and made clear that we can support that
Read statement