Alaska's election officials say DOJ's requested relief would threaten election integrity

State of AlaskaState election defendants (Division of Elections Director Carol Beecher, the Election Boards and the State Ballot Counting Review Board), through the Alaska Department of Law in a motion to dismiss

Condemned

In their motion to dismiss, Alaska's election officials say that delaying certification only if a particular candidate does not win would interfere with state election administration and threaten election integrity. They ask the court to dismiss DOJ's complaint with prejudice.

“Delaying certification of Alaska’s election results—but only if a particular candidate does not win—would interfere with state election administration and threaten election integrity.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)United States v. State of Alaska: Alaska election officials' motion to dismissDocument 18, pages 10-11

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)CNBC: Judge fast-tracks DOJ's Alaska Senate lawsuit as Peltola seeks dismissal before Election Day · CNBCParagraphs 1-6
Sen. Dan Sullivan speaks into a microphone at a press conference in Fairbanks, Alaska.
Credit: Army Sgt. Amber I. Smith / U.S. Department of Defense

Where this statement fits

DOJ challenges Alaska Senate certification over two Sullivans; Murkowski objects

DOJ sued Alaska over the presence of two candidates named Dan Sullivan on the Senate ballot. It seeks to prevent certification under specified conditions involving an incumbent loss and the possible effect of namesake votes. Lisa Murkowski and Mary Peltola criticize the intervention.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

United States v. State of Alaska: Alaska election officials' motion to dismiss (opens in a new tab)Document 18, pages 10-11

About this source

Motion to dismiss filed Oct. 26 in No. 3:26-cv-00376 (D. Alaska), as mirrored by CourtListener (RECAP). The state's election defendants argue that the United States lacks standing, that the complaint states no claim under the National Voter Registration Act and that the suit violates the Elections Clause, and they ask for dismissal with prejudice.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

CNBC: Judge fast-tracks DOJ's Alaska Senate lawsuit as Peltola seeks dismissal before Election Day (opens in a new tab) · CNBCParagraphs 1-6

About this source

CNBC report on Judge Sharon Gleason's Oct. 26 order expediting the case and on the motion to dismiss that Alaska election officials filed the same evening. First published Oct. 26 and updated after the order.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The passage comes in the motion's standing argument. Just before it, the motion says the relief DOJ requests would sow confusion and erode trust in Alaska's election result a week before Election Day, and that neither the declaration nor the injunction DOJ appears to seek would help protect election integrity.

After the quotation

The motion goes on to say that the investigation DOJ requests would violate ballot secrecy, because it would require identifying the voters who cast ballots for Daniel J. Sullivan so they could later be questioned about their intent.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case concerns DOJ's request to block certification of Alaska's Senate result if Sen. Dan S. Sullivan loses. Alaska's election officials say that this conditional delay would interfere with how the state runs its election and threaten election integrity, and they ask the court to dismiss the suit with prejudice. The passage criticizes the relief DOJ seeks as harmful to the election.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
United States Department of Justice

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: State of Alaska, Alaska's election officials say DOJ's requested relief would threaten election integrityDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Alaska's election officials say DOJ's requested relief would threaten election integrity
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7035-in-their-motion-to-dismiss-alaska-s-election

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Alaska's election officials say DOJ's requested relief would threaten election integrity". First published: 2026-10-28. Last updated: 2026-10-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/7035-in-their-motion-to-dismiss-alaska-s-election