Plaintiff coalitions condemn DOJ's grant restrictions
Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceRICADV and fellow plaintiff coalitions speaking in a joint statement
The plaintiff coalitions welcome the vacatur and criticize the funding conditions as an attack on survivor services.
“an unlawful and unconscionable attack on vital federal funding”
Official statement
Other statements by Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence in this case
- RICADV and co-plaintiffs challenge OVW funding conditionsEarlier: Condemned

Where this statement fits
DOJ defends domestic-violence grant conditions; service coalitions challenge them
Domestic-violence service coalitions challenged DOJ's grant certification and funding restrictions, alleging unlawful pressure on services and speech. DOJ defended its authority and nondiscrimination requirements. A September 29, 2026 judgment set the challenged conditions aside under the APA; DOJ acknowledges the vacatur.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
The plaintiff coalitions criticize the conditions and welcome the order setting them aside. The court resolved the APA grounds and declined a broader permanent injunction.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The plaintiff coalitions respond to the September 29 order setting aside the challenged funding conditions.
After the quotation
The statement says the grants sustain shelters, crisis response services and legal assistance for survivors, and that the ruling gives the funding lasting protection.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The coalitions criticize the DOJ funding restrictions examined in this case. Their praise of vacatur is not a defense of those restrictions.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseSuper says reissuing grant conditions is common but warns of a pattern of reissued policies
“the Department's choice to reissue grant conditions is not especially unusual. ... That being said, this Administration has a well-established pattern of re-issuing the very policies it has been enjoined from applying in a new format.”Read statement
DOJ defends the certification as a longstanding requirement
United States Department of Justice
“That certification simply reflects longstanding features of OVW’s grant framework.”Read statement
Bonta says the grant restrictions endanger survivors
“The Trump Administration’s politically driven restrictions on accessing these grants are not only unlawful, but they also put lives at risk.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Plaintiff coalitions condemn DOJ's grant restrictions
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6836-the-plaintiff-coalitions-welcome-the-vacatur-and-criticize
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Plaintiff coalitions condemn DOJ's grant restrictions". First published: 2026-10-26. Last updated: 2026-10-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/6836-the-plaintiff-coalitions-welcome-the-vacatur-and-criticize