Plaintiff coalitions condemn DOJ's grant restrictions

Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic ViolenceRICADV and fellow plaintiff coalitions speaking in a joint statement

Condemned

The plaintiff coalitions welcome the vacatur and criticize the funding conditions as an attack on survivor services.

“an unlawful and unconscionable attack on vital federal funding”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Plaintiff coalitions respond to the Rhode Island DOJ grant-conditions rulingJoint coalition statement following the September 29 order

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Other statements by Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence in this case

The Robert F. Kennedy Department of Justice Building beside a Washington street.
Credit: Voice of America / Public domain

Where this statement fits

DOJ defends domestic-violence grant conditions; service coalitions challenge them

Domestic-violence service coalitions challenged DOJ's grant certification and funding restrictions, alleging unlawful pressure on services and speech. DOJ defended its authority and nondiscrimination requirements. A September 29, 2026 judgment set the challenged conditions aside under the APA; DOJ acknowledges the vacatur.

Read the full case

Source and context

Official statement

Plaintiff coalitions respond to the Rhode Island DOJ grant-conditions ruling (opens in a new tab)Joint coalition statement following the September 29 order

About this source

The plaintiff coalitions criticize the conditions and welcome the order setting them aside. The court resolved the APA grounds and declined a broader permanent injunction.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The plaintiff coalitions respond to the September 29 order setting aside the challenged funding conditions.

After the quotation

The statement says the grants sustain shelters, crisis response services and legal assistance for survivors, and that the ruling gives the funding lasting protection.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The coalitions criticize the DOJ funding restrictions examined in this case. Their praise of vacatur is not a defense of those restrictions.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Rhode Island Coalition Against Domestic Violence, Plaintiff coalitions condemn DOJ's grant restrictionsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Plaintiff coalitions condemn DOJ's grant restrictions
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6836-the-plaintiff-coalitions-welcome-the-vacatur-and-criticize

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Plaintiff coalitions condemn DOJ's grant restrictions". First published: 2026-10-26. Last updated: 2026-10-26. https://disputeindex.com/events/6836-the-plaintiff-coalitions-welcome-the-vacatur-and-criticize