DOJ defends the certification as a longstanding requirement

United States Department of JusticeDOJ counsel defending the challenged grant conditions

DOJ argues that the certification reflects existing nondiscrimination obligations and does not impose new requirements.

“That certification simply reflects longstanding features of OVW’s grant framework.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)DOJ's cross-motion for summary judgment in RICADV v. Blanche · United States Department of JusticeECF 72, page 12 and pages 25-27; filed July 8, 2026

Where this statement fits

DOJ defends domestic-violence grant conditions; service coalitions challenge them

Domestic-violence service coalitions challenged DOJ's grant certification and funding restrictions, alleging unlawful pressure on services and speech. DOJ defended its authority and nondiscrimination requirements. A September 29, 2026 judgment set the challenged conditions aside under the APA; DOJ acknowledges the vacatur.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

DOJ's cross-motion for summary judgment in RICADV v. Blanche (opens in a new tab) · United States Department of JusticeECF 72, page 12 and pages 25-27; filed July 8, 2026

About this source

DOJ defends the grant conditions and argues that the certification reflects longstanding nondiscrimination requirements.

Before the quotation

DOJ files its cross-motion for summary judgment against the service coalitions.

After the quotation

The government points to earlier civil-rights and materiality provisions and argues that its agency reasoning was adequate.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The case concerns DOJ's grant conditions. The merits brief expressly defends the certification and asks the court to uphold the requirements.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: United States Department of Justice, DOJ defends the certification as a longstanding requirementDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
DOJ defends the certification as a longstanding requirement
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6814-doj-argues-that-the-certification-reflects-existing-nondiscrimination

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "DOJ defends the certification as a longstanding requirement". First published: 2026-10-25. Last updated: 2026-10-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/6814-doj-argues-that-the-certification-reflects-existing-nondiscrimination