Feinberg defends the use of congressional toll records
Michael FeinbergFormer FBI assistant special agent in charge and Lawfare writer
Feinberg argues that toll records are a routine investigative tool and that the legislators' roles in the events under investigation made the requests relevant.
“From the point of view of an investigator or experienced prosecutor, reviewing toll records is not a particularly invasive technique.”
Analysis

Where this statement fits
Were members of Congress's phone records and text messages properly obtained in the Arctic Frost and Jack Smith investigations?
On September 29, 2026, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled "Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters," with former special counsel Jack Smith as its only witness. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and other Republicans said that Smith's team, in the FBI's Arctic Frost investigation and its own election case, obtained members of Congress's phone toll records and text messages, used nondisclosure orders to keep members from learning of it, and breached the Speech or Debate Clause. Smith said the toll records were non-content records obtained after he directed his staff to consult the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, and that the nondisclosure orders were consistent with the law and Justice Department policy at the time. Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-IL) called the attacks on Smith "petty, personal, and political." The sides and the documents give different counts of the members affected. The dispute is whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper.
Source and context
Analysis
About this source
Feinberg defends the toll-record requests and argues that public documents do not show improper investigative methods.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
He distinguishes call metadata from the content of communications.
After the quotation
He argues that released records do not demonstrate improper methods and criticizes the presentation of those records by congressional opponents.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Relative to obtaining congressional phone records in Arctic Frost, Feinberg defends the requests as routine, relevant investigative work.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseGrassley calls Smith's actions unlawful and unconstitutional
“the major embarrassment of the hearing was Democrats falling over themselves defending unlawful and unconstitutional actions by Jack Smith.”Read statement
Harker argues for personal accountability in Blackburn's suit
“She filed it against Jack Smith in his personal capacity to seek accountability, not money”Read statement
Chenoweth condemns alleged concealment supporting the records order
“I think that it's intolerable behavior”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Feinberg defends the use of congressional toll records
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6782-feinberg-argues-that-toll-records-are-a-routine
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Feinberg defends the use of congressional toll records". First published: 2026-10-25. Last updated: 2026-10-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/6782-feinberg-argues-that-toll-records-are-a-routine