Harker argues for personal accountability in Blackburn's suit

L. Margaret HarkerNCLA senior litigation counsel representing Marsha Blackburn

Harker says Smith abused his authority and backs Blackburn's bid to hold him personally accountable.

“She filed it against Jack Smith in his personal capacity to seek accountability, not money”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Margaret Harker discusses Blackburn's phone-records lawsuit1:02-2:38 and 3:11-3:55
The Hart Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C., photographed from across a street on a clear day.
Credit: Architect of the Capitol

Where this statement fits

Were members of Congress's phone records and text messages properly obtained in the Arctic Frost and Jack Smith investigations?

On September 29, 2026, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled "Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters," with former special counsel Jack Smith as its only witness. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and other Republicans said that Smith's team, in the FBI's Arctic Frost investigation and its own election case, obtained members of Congress's phone toll records and text messages, used nondisclosure orders to keep members from learning of it, and breached the Speech or Debate Clause. Smith said the toll records were non-content records obtained after he directed his staff to consult the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, and that the nondisclosure orders were consistent with the law and Justice Department policy at the time. Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-IL) called the attacks on Smith "petty, personal, and political." The sides and the documents give different counts of the members affected. The dispute is whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper.

Read the full case

Case updates

Following the fight over members' phone records in Arctic Frost?

Get an email if Blackburn's lawsuit or Hagerty's bar complaint produces a ruling, if the Senate acts on subpoena-notice rules, or if Smith responds.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Interview

Margaret Harker discusses Blackburn's phone-records lawsuit (opens in a new tab)1:02-2:38 and 3:11-3:55

About this source

The complete Lars Larson interview covers the challenge to Smith's authority and the request for personal accountability. Harker's legal conclusions are advocacy.

Before the quotation

Lars Larson asks about the purpose and legal basis of Blackburn's lawsuit.

After the quotation

Harker is counsel for Blackburn. Her claims about Smith's appointment and investigative acts are advocacy, not a judgment in this lawsuit.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Harker criticizes Smith's exercise of authority and supports holding him accountable. This is opposition to the conduct at issue, not a defense of it.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: L. Margaret Harker, Harker argues for personal accountability in Blackburn's suitDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Harker argues for personal accountability in Blackburn's suit
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6055-harker-says-smith-abused-his-authority-and-backs

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Harker argues for personal accountability in Blackburn's suit". First published: 2026-10-19. Last updated: 2026-10-19. https://disputeindex.com/events/6055-harker-says-smith-abused-his-authority-and-backs