Chenoweth condemns alleged concealment supporting the records order
Mark ChenowethPresident of the New Civil Liberties Alliance and counsel for Blackburn
Chenoweth condemns what he describes as deliberate concealment from the judge in obtaining a nondisclosure order.
“I think that it's intolerable behavior”
Interview

Where this statement fits
Were members of Congress's phone records and text messages properly obtained in the Arctic Frost and Jack Smith investigations?
On September 29, 2026, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled "Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters," with former special counsel Jack Smith as its only witness. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and other Republicans said that Smith's team, in the FBI's Arctic Frost investigation and its own election case, obtained members of Congress's phone toll records and text messages, used nondisclosure orders to keep members from learning of it, and breached the Speech or Debate Clause. Smith said the toll records were non-content records obtained after he directed his staff to consult the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, and that the nondisclosure orders were consistent with the law and Justice Department policy at the time. Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-IL) called the attacks on Smith "petty, personal, and political." The sides and the documents give different counts of the members affected. The dispute is whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper.
Source and context
Interview
About this source
Just the News reports its own interview with Chenoweth about Blackburn's suit. The interview date is not specified.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
Just the News interviews him about Blackburn's challenge to the records collection.
After the quotation
The alleged concealment is contested advocacy. The interview date is unspecified; September 30 is the publication date.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is the investigators' collection of congressional communications records. Chenoweth condemns what he describes as deliberate concealment from the judge in obtaining a nondisclosure order.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseGrassley calls Smith's actions unlawful and unconstitutional
“the major embarrassment of the hearing was Democrats falling over themselves defending unlawful and unconstitutional actions by Jack Smith.”Read statement
Harker argues for personal accountability in Blackburn's suit
“She filed it against Jack Smith in his personal capacity to seek accountability, not money”Read statement
Chenoweth says prosecutors' aims did not justify Smith's methods
“ends did not justify the means”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Chenoweth condemns alleged concealment supporting the records order
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/6056-chenoweth-condemns-what-he-describes-as-deliberate-concealment
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Chenoweth condemns alleged concealment supporting the records order". First published: 2026-10-19. Last updated: 2026-10-19. https://disputeindex.com/events/6056-chenoweth-condemns-what-he-describes-as-deliberate-concealment