Kagan says Warhol's purpose and character count powerfully in his favor

Elena KaganAssociate justice writing in dissent

Kagan argues that Warhol's use of Goldsmith's photo counts powerfully in his favor under the purpose-and-character inquiry.

“But the “purpose and character of [Warhol’s] use” of the copyrighted work—what he did to the Goldsmith photo, in service of what objects—counts powerfully in his favor. He started with an old photo, but he created a new new thing.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Supreme Court opinions in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith · Supreme Court of the United StatesMajority pages 12-38; Kagan dissent; Gorsuch concurrence

Where this statement fits

Warhol's Prince image: Sotomayor and Kagan split over fair use

The Supreme Court held that the first fair-use factor favored Lynn Goldsmith over the Andy Warhol Foundation's 2016 commercial magazine license of Orange Prince. Sonia Sotomayor's majority and Elena Kagan's dissent disagree over the weight of the artwork's transformation in meaning.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Supreme Court opinions in Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesMajority pages 12-38; Kagan dissent; Gorsuch concurrence

About this source

The Court considers the first fair-use factor for the Foundation's 2016 commercial magazine license, rather than every use of the Prince Series.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Kagan acknowledges that Warhol's use had a commercial aspect.

After the quotation

The dissent next criticizes the majority's view of the images.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The conduct under scrutiny is the Foundation's 2016 Orange Prince magazine license and its first-factor fair-use defense. Kagan supports that defense by arguing that significant transformation should favor the copier under the first factor.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Elena Kagan, Kagan says Warhol's purpose and character count powerfully in his favorDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kagan says Warhol's purpose and character count powerfully in his favor
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6725-kagan-argues-that-warhol-s-use-of-goldsmith

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kagan says Warhol's purpose and character count powerfully in his favor". First published: 2026-10-25. Last updated: 2026-10-25. https://disputeindex.com/events/6725-kagan-argues-that-warhol-s-use-of-goldsmith