Goldsmith declines further comment after the defence referral

Paul GoldsmithMinister of Defence, issuing a government statement

Goldsmith declines to elaborate on the resignation after the matter is referred to the Inspector-General of Defence.

“Since this matter has now been referred to the Inspector General of Defence, I have nothing further to add.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Chief of Defence resigns: Paul Goldsmith statementNew Zealand Government press release, 23 October 2026, 4:26 pm NZDT; final paragraph.
Air Marshal Tony Davies
Credit: Government House

Where this statement fits

Tony Davies resignation: vetting and disclosure questions

Tony Davies resigned as New Zealand's defence chief after acknowledging an undisclosed inappropriate relationship. Former Defence Minister Ron Mark says the Public Service Commission and military leadership failed the Minister. The NZ Herald reports a letter sent to Davies days earlier about an alleged 2006 relationship. NZDF and Defence Minister Paul Goldsmith cite an Inspector-General referral and give no further detail.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Chief of Defence resigns: Paul Goldsmith statement (opens in a new tab)New Zealand Government press release, 23 October 2026, 4:26 pm NZDT; final paragraph.

About this source

Full reprint of Goldsmith's government statement. He agrees Davies cannot remain in office, sets out interim leadership and declines further comment after the referral. The original release is at https://www.beehive.govt.nz/release/chief-defence-resigns.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Goldsmith identifies previously undisclosed integrity matters, says both men agree Davies cannot remain in office, and sets out interim command arrangements.

After the quotation

The statement ends with Goldsmith's refusal to add further comment because of the referral.

How this statement is classified

Explicitly stayed out

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the official public explanation of Davies's resignation, Goldsmith expressly declines to elaborate. The refusal does not assert that the earlier vetting was adequate.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Paul Goldsmith, Goldsmith declines further comment after the defence referralDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Goldsmith declines further comment after the defence referral
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6579-goldsmith-declines-to-elaborate-on-the-resignation-after

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Goldsmith declines further comment after the defence referral". First published: 2026-10-28. Last updated: 2026-10-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/6579-goldsmith-declines-to-elaborate-on-the-resignation-after