Hague questions Davies's disclosures during security vetting

Matthew HagueMilitary lawyer and former Defence Force member, speaking in a Newstalk ZB interview; also an ACT candidate

Hague says an integrity breach would raise questions about Davies's disclosures during repeated security vetting.

“there's questions about whether he disclosed it over the years during that process as well”

Interview

Open the original interview (opens in a new tab)Matthew Hague on the Chief of Defence Force's resignationFull 2:41 interview, especially 01:16-02:28.

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Matthew Hague: ACT candidate biographyMatthew Hague, Wellington North, About section.

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)The Chief of Defence, the alleged affair and the letter he read before he quitOpening section on Staunton's letter; Goldsmith's answer on NZDF culture; NZDF and Hague responses near the end
Air Marshal Tony Davies
Credit: Government House

Where this statement fits

Tony Davies resignation: vetting and disclosure questions

Tony Davies resigned as New Zealand's defence chief after acknowledging an undisclosed inappropriate relationship. Former Defence Minister Ron Mark says the Public Service Commission and military leadership failed the Minister. The NZ Herald reports a letter sent to Davies days earlier about an alleged 2006 relationship. NZDF and Defence Minister Paul Goldsmith cite an Inspector-General referral and give no further detail.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Interview

Matthew Hague on the Chief of Defence Force's resignation (opens in a new tab)Full 2:41 interview, especially 01:16-02:28.

About this source

Hague discusses security vetting and disclosure while stressing uncertainty about the circumstances. The interview includes questions from du Plessis-Allan. Hague's discussion of possible integrity breaches is conditional.

Original text

Matthew Hague: ACT candidate biography (opens in a new tab)Matthew Hague, Wellington North, About section.

About this source

ACT's candidate biography identifies Hague as the director of Frontline Law and a former member of the Navy, Defence Force and Police. It supports identification and political capacity, not an ACT position on Davies's resignation.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

The Chief of Defence, the alleged affair and the letter he read before he quit (opens in a new tab)Opening section on Staunton's letter; Goldsmith's answer on NZDF culture; NZDF and Hague responses near the end

About this source

The Herald reports that former RNZAF flight sergeant Kate Staunton wrote to Davies days before his resignation about a relationship he was alleged to have had in 2006 with a woman under his command at 40 Squadron. It reports that the woman confirmed the letter's account that she was formally investigated and later left the service, and that it understands the relationship was denied at the time. The article also covers Staunton's separate complaint about how NZDF handled another alleged relationship. NZDF said it would answer the Herald's questions in due course, and the article identifies lawyer Matthew Hague as acting for Staunton.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Du Plessis-Allan asks about vetting and how the matter surfaced. Hague describes security vetting as rigorous and makes his disclosure concern conditional on an integrity breach. He says his connection to someone involved limits what he can discuss, without specifying the connection.

After the quotation

Hague links the questions to Davies's repeated vetting. He does not conclude that institutional checks failed. The Herald later reported that Hague acts for Kate Staunton, a former RNZAF flight sergeant who wrote to Davies days before he resigned.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Relative to the handling of integrity information in Davies's vetting, Hague makes his criticism depend on an unresolved integrity breach. He raises disclosure questions without concluding that the checks failed.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Tony Davies

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Matthew Hague, Hague questions Davies's disclosures during security vettingDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Hague questions Davies's disclosures during security vetting
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6578-hague-says-an-integrity-breach-would-raise-questions

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Hague questions Davies's disclosures during security vetting". First published: 2026-10-28. Last updated: 2026-10-28. https://disputeindex.com/events/6578-hague-says-an-integrity-breach-would-raise-questions