Kavanaugh rejects Sackett's narrow wetlands test

Brett KavanaughAssociate justice, concurring in the judgment

Kavanaugh argues that the majority's wetlands test departs from the statute and precedent.

Responding to

Clean Water Act coverage of adjacent wetlands requires a continuous surface connection that makes the wetland practically indistinguishable from covered waters.

“In my view, the Court’s “continuous surface connection” test departs from the statutory text, from 45 years of consistent agency practice, and from this Court’s precedents.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Sackett v. EPA: majority and separate opinions · Supreme Court of the United StatesNo. 21-454; Alito majority pages 19-22 and 27-28; Kavanaugh concurrence pages 1-14

Where this statement fits

Alito and Kavanaugh split over Sackett's Clean Water Act wetlands test

All nine justices agreed that the Sacketts should win their wetlands case. They split over the governing test. Justice Samuel Alito requires a continuous surface connection to covered waters; Justice Brett Kavanaugh says that excludes neighboring wetlands Congress protected.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Sackett v. EPA: majority and separate opinions (opens in a new tab) · Supreme Court of the United StatesNo. 21-454; Alito majority pages 19-22 and 27-28; Kavanaugh concurrence pages 1-14

About this source

The justices agree on the judgment for the Sacketts but divide over the continuous-surface-connection test for covered wetlands.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Kavanaugh agrees that the Sacketts should prevail and that the significant-nexus test should be rejected.

After the quotation

He rejects replacing adjacent with adjoining, citing neighboring wetlands separated by barriers.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

His criticism is directed at the majority's test. Agreement with the judgment does not defend that test.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Brett Kavanaugh, Kavanaugh rejects Sackett's narrow wetlands testDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kavanaugh rejects Sackett's narrow wetlands test
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6455-kavanaugh-argues-that-the-majority-s-wetlands-test

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kavanaugh rejects Sackett's narrow wetlands test". First published: 2026-10-22. Last updated: 2026-10-22. https://disputeindex.com/events/6455-kavanaugh-argues-that-the-majority-s-wetlands-test