Golin calls for a five-year pause on school AI
Fairplay executive director
“Should student-facing AI products be used in schools at all?”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Josh Golin: Fairplay statement on the AFT/UFT deal with Microsoft · FairplayThreshold question on student-facing use; five-year pause and enforcement criticism
Source and context
Official statement
Josh Golin: Fairplay statement on the AFT/UFT deal with Microsoft (opens in a new tab) · FairplayThreshold question on student-facing use; five-year pause and enforcement criticism
About this source
Golin credits privacy improvements but calls for a five-year pause on generative AI in schools, arguing that learning benefits, developmental risks and enforcement remain unresolved.
Before the quotation
Golin responds to the Microsoft–AFT/UFT announcement.
After the quotation
He argues learning benefits, developmental risks and school-level enforcement remain unresolved.
How this statement is classified
Condemned
Responding to: Schools should pause generative AI for five years while safety and educational benefits are assessed.
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Opposes student-facing deployment. Praise for privacy improvements does not alter the pause demand.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should schools pause student-facing AI despite Microsoft’s new privacy safeguards?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“anything less than legally enforceable provisions is simply a wish list”Read statement
“Recorded action: De La Rosa co-authored the September 2 statement urging postponement of NYC’s high-school AI pilots.”Read statement
“Chancellor Samuels should postpone these pilots until the tools can be properly assessed.”Read statement