McGrath and Bailey accept younger-child pauses but support controlled pilots

Amy McGrath (ASU Prep)ASU Prep Academy managing director and CEO, coauthor with John Bailey

McGrath and Bailey accept pauses for the youngest students but favor educator use and limited, age-appropriate pilots. They call for privacy review, monitoring and instruction that requires students to defend their reasoning.

“The impulse to pause is understandable, and appropriate for the youngest students.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Amy McGrath and John Bailey argue for controlled school AI pilotsJointly authored October 23 opinion essay
Randi Weingarten speaking into a microphone at a teachers' union rally and Brad Smith gesturing while speaking at a law-school panel, in separate photographs.
Credit: Charles Edward Miller; Doc Searls; composite by The Dispute Index

Where this statement fits

Should schools pause student-facing AI despite Microsoft’s new privacy safeguards?

Microsoft and the National Academy for AI Instruction signed school-AI privacy and safety standards announced with the AFT and UFT on September 9. Fairplay’s Josh Golin welcomes the privacy improvements but calls for a five-year pause on generative AI in schools. New York City’s September 2 policy illustrates a different approach: pause most direct use through eighth grade while allowing restricted high-school pilots. Kristen Gonzalez and Carmen De La Rosa support the younger-grade ban but urge postponement of the pilots until the tools can be properly assessed.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

Amy McGrath and John Bailey argue for controlled school AI pilots (opens in a new tab)Jointly authored October 23 opinion essay

About this source

The authors accept pauses for the youngest students and support educator use and limited pilots.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Their joint opinion essay discusses New York City and Los Angeles restrictions. The publisher identifies the views as the authors' own.

After the quotation

They use ASU Prep's experiments as examples; McGrath leads that network, so these are partly an institutional self-assessment.

How this statement is classified

Mixed or conditional

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The authors accept younger-child pauses but support controlled experience rather than a blanket halt.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Amy McGrath (ASU Prep), McGrath and Bailey accept younger-child pauses but support controlled pilotsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
McGrath and Bailey accept younger-child pauses but support controlled pilots
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/7330-mcgrath-and-bailey-accept-pauses-for-the-youngest

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "McGrath and Bailey accept younger-child pauses but support controlled pilots". First published: 2026-10-30. Last updated: 2026-10-30. https://disputeindex.com/events/7330-mcgrath-and-bailey-accept-pauses-for-the-youngest