ACLU co-issues opposition to USPS election requirements
American Civil Liberties UnionCo-issuer of joint plaintiff-and-counsel statement
The ACLU joins plaintiffs and counsel in opposing USPS’s authority and warning of chaos and disenfranchisement.
Responding to
USPS lacks authority to impose these election-administration requirements, and enforcing them now would threaten voters’ access to mailed ballots.
“USPS has no authority in the Constitution or federal law over how states administer mail voting”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?
USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Coalition statement opposing the rule’s authority and immediate implementation. The quotation is jointly issued, not an independently attributed statement from every listed organization or spokesperson.
Before the quotation
The district court grants preliminary relief.
After the quotation
The jointly issued statement welcomes the block as ballots are being sent.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Rejects mandatory enforcement. This is one coalition statement, recorded for the participating ACLU.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full casePritzker says Illinois sued over Trump's mail-voting threat and won
“That's why we added polling locations statewide, and when Donald Trump threatened mail-in voting, we took him to court—and won.”Read statement
Kate Starbird says the administration's mail-voting push sowed doubt and confusion
“The bad news: The Trump admin's efforts to interfere w/ mail-in-voting were successful in sowing doubt & confusion. The good news: That's not stopping voters who are getting the message to vote early, use official ballot dropboxes, & track their ballots.”Read statement
Shapiro says Trump tried to limit Pennsylvanians' mail-in voting
“Donald Trump tried to prevent Pennsylvania voters from making their voices heard in this election by attempting to limit mail-in voting.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- ACLU co-issues opposition to USPS election requirements
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/640-the-aclu-joins-plaintiffs-and-counsel-in-opposing
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "ACLU co-issues opposition to USPS election requirements". First published: 2026-09-15. Last updated: 2026-09-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/640-the-aclu-joins-plaintiffs-and-counsel-in-opposing