Bonta warns of disruption from immediate implementation
California attorney general
“the consequences would have been catastrophic”
Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Weber, Bonta and Newsom respond to Supreme Court mail-voting decisionPress release 26-116; separately attributed quotation blocks
Source and context
Official statement
Weber, Bonta and Newsom respond to Supreme Court mail-voting decision (opens in a new tab)Press release 26-116; separately attributed quotation blocks
About this source
California officials welcome the stay denial and oppose enforcement before the midterms. The release contains distinct statements from Weber, Bonta and Newsom.
Before the quotation
Bonta welcomes denial of the government’s stay request.
After the quotation
He stresses the importance of mail voting to affected states.
How this statement is classified
Condemned
Case context: Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?
The label describes this statement’s response within the context above.
Why this label?
Condemns the consequences of the proposed November rollout.
- Recorded on
- Published here
Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?
Explore the case context, sources and public responses.
More from this case
Read the full case“California stood up for democracy and we won”Read statement
“Now, let the people vote!”Read statement
“Donald Trump is trying to make it harder for folks to vote just weeks before an election”Read statement