Merkley opposes late ballot-mail changes

Jeff MerkleyUnited States senator from Oregon

Merkley opposes the rule as a late restriction on voters and challenges federal control of mailed ballots.

“Donald Trump is trying to make it harder for folks to vote just weeks before an election”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Merkley and Wyden urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-voting rule · Jeff MerkleySeparately attributed Merkley and Wyden quotation blocks
Mail In Voting
Credit: ShanaKFriend

Where this statement fits

Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?

USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.

Read the full case

Case updates

Next steps for the blocked USPS ballot-mail rule

Get an email if courts rule on the broader challenge to the rule, or if the administration or USPS moves to apply it to later elections.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Merkley and Wyden urge Supreme Court to block USPS mail-voting rule (opens in a new tab) · Jeff MerkleySeparately attributed Merkley and Wyden quotation blocks

About this source

Joint Senate release with each senator’s own criticism of the rule. Descriptions of Trump’s motives and the rule’s legality are their positions.

Before the quotation

The release describes a congressional challenge to the rule.

After the quotation

Merkley frames vote-by-mail access as a constitutional-rights issue.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Directly criticizes 2026 enforcement and its effects on voters.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Jeff Merkley, Merkley opposes late ballot-mail changesDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Merkley opposes late ballot-mail changes
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/635-merkley-opposes-the-rule-as-a-late-restriction

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Merkley opposes late ballot-mail changes". First published: 2026-09-15. Last updated: 2026-09-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/635-merkley-opposes-the-rule-as-a-late-restriction