Sauer seeks enforcement of the ballot-mail rule

D. John SauerU.S. solicitor general, representing the government

Sauer argues that the USPS requirements are lawful postal controls and seeks immediate relief from the November injunction.

Responding to

Mandatory USPS ballot-mail requirements are lawful postal controls and should be enforced for the November 2026 election.

“an important federal policy to protect the mails from being used to commit voter fraud”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)USPS v. California: Government application for a stay, No. 26A305 · United States Postal ServicePrinted p.13 (PDF p.18); application’s argument and requested relief
Mail In Voting
Credit: ShanaKFriend

Where this statement fits

Should Trump’s new mail-in voting restrictions apply to the 2026 midterms?

USPS’s new federal ballot-mail rule requires election officials to meet envelope standards, enroll voters through a federal portal and submit outgoing ballots for verification. The Trump administration argues these are lawful anti-fraud postal controls. Challenging states and civil-rights organizations say USPS is intruding into state-run elections and that the late rollout threatens voters’ access. On September 14, the Supreme Court left a temporary block in place for the 2026 election. Alito and Thomas would have allowed enforcement; Kavanaugh objected to applying the rule this year.

Read the full case

Case updates

Next steps for the blocked USPS ballot-mail rule

Get an email if courts rule on the broader challenge to the rule, or if the administration or USPS moves to apply it to later elections.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

USPS v. California: Government application for a stay, No. 26A305 (opens in a new tab) · United States Postal ServicePrinted p.13 (PDF p.18); application’s argument and requested relief

About this source

Government litigation position seeking immediate relief from the preliminary injunction. It argues that the requirements fall within postal powers and protect against fraudulent use of the mail.

Before the quotation

The government applies for a Supreme Court stay.

After the quotation

The application argues the controls are modest and do not transfer election administration to USPS.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Defends 2026 enforcement through the government’s stay application.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: D. John Sauer, Sauer seeks enforcement of the ballot-mail ruleDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Sauer seeks enforcement of the ballot-mail rule
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/630-sauer-argues-that-the-usps-requirements-are-lawful

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Sauer seeks enforcement of the ballot-mail rule". First published: 2026-09-15. Last updated: 2026-09-15. https://disputeindex.com/events/630-sauer-argues-that-the-usps-requirements-are-lawful