Adam Schiff criticizes Citizens United's effect on election transparency

Adam SchiffU.S. senator from California

Schiff argues that Citizens United allowed corporate dark money to weaken election transparency and democracy.

“The Supreme Court’s decision in Citizens United opened the door for corporations to pour billions of dollars of dark money into elections. This anonymous and unrestricted spending cripples transparency in the political process and weakens our democracy.”

Official statement

Read the official statement (opens in a new tab)Schiff, Neguse, McGovern and Lee announce an amendment to overturn Citizens UnitedSeparately attributed quotations from Schiff, McGovern and Lee
The west facade and columns of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington.
Credit: Claire Anderson / CC0

Where this statement fits

Citizens United: Corporate election spending and free speech

The Supreme Court protected corporate and union independent election spending in Citizens United. Defenders say the ruling protects political speech and association. Critics say it gives wealthy interests excessive influence and undermines democratic accountability.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Official statement

Schiff, Neguse, McGovern and Lee announce an amendment to overturn Citizens United (opens in a new tab)Separately attributed quotations from Schiff, McGovern and Lee

About this source

September 17, 2025 Senate release containing separately attributed statements from Schiff, McGovern and Lee about overturning Citizens United. The same quotations appeared in a later Neguse release.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Schiff and Representatives Joe Neguse, Jim McGovern and Summer Lee introduced a constitutional amendment to overturn Citizens United.

After the quotation

He says the amendment will keep big money out of politics and restore power to the American people.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

Schiff criticizes Citizens United and the corporate influence he says it enabled. His support for reversing the ruling is opposition to it.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Supreme Court of the United States

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Adam Schiff, Adam Schiff criticizes Citizens United's effect on election transparencyDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Adam Schiff criticizes Citizens United's effect on election transparency
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6286-schiff-argues-that-citizens-united-allowed-corporate-dark

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Adam Schiff criticizes Citizens United's effect on election transparency". First published: 2026-10-20. Last updated: 2026-10-20. https://disputeindex.com/events/6286-schiff-argues-that-citizens-united-allowed-corporate-dark