Reich calls for making Citizens United history through state laws

Robert ReichFormer U.S. labor secretary and political commentator

Reich criticizes Citizens United and argues that states could limit corporations' power to spend in elections. He urges California and Montana to lead that effort.

“It’s time to make Citizens United history. California (and Montana) can lead the way.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)Reich criticizes Citizens United and proposes limits on corporate powersExhibit 2, PDF pp. 65-70; reprinted article pp. 1-5
The west facade and columns of the U.S. Supreme Court Building in Washington.
Credit: Claire Anderson / CC0

Where this statement fits

Citizens United: Corporate election spending and free speech

The Supreme Court protected corporate and union independent election spending in Citizens United. Defenders say the ruling protects political speech and association. Critics say it gives wealthy interests excessive influence and undermines democratic accountability.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

Reich criticizes Citizens United and proposes limits on corporate powers (opens in a new tab)Exhibit 2, PDF pp. 65-70; reprinted article pp. 1-5

About this source

The Minnesota House committee exhibit reproduces Reich's February 25 article in full. Reich criticizes Citizens United and proposes state limits on corporate political powers; the article does not establish that courts would uphold that approach.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Reich argues that states can withhold corporations' power to spend in politics. His approach distinguishes corporate powers from corporate rights.

After the quotation

He endorses proposed California legislation and a Montana initiative as ways to limit corporate political spending. This is his proposed legal strategy, not a court ruling accepting it.

How this statement is classified

Condemned

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The ruling protecting corporate independent spending is the action under scrutiny. Reich explicitly calls for making it history and argues for limiting its practical effect. His support for an alternative state-law approach is grounded in opposition to the ruling.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Zach Wahls proposes an Iowa response to Citizens United

Zach Wahls

“The point is straightforward: Iowa’s democracy should belong to Iowans, not to corporate dark money and not to anonymous political spenders. I’m fighting for this because I believe the public’s business should be done in public, and because Iowans deserve a government that works for them, and when we reduce the corrupting influence of corporate money in our politics, we can create space to actually solve problems, lower costs and rebuild trust.”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Robert Reich, Reich calls for making Citizens United history through state lawsDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Reich calls for making Citizens United history through state laws
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/6100-reich-criticizes-citizens-united-and-argues-that-states

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Reich calls for making Citizens United history through state laws". First published: 2026-10-20. Last updated: 2026-10-20. https://disputeindex.com/events/6100-reich-criticizes-citizens-united-and-argues-that-states