Sellers defends excluding student IDs to reduce possible fraud

John SellersRepublican state representative and HB 323 cosponsor

Sellers says the change to stop accepting student IDs is meant to reduce possible fraud and to make sure voters are domiciled in New Hampshire.

“It’s a simple change to not allowing student IDs as valid identification cards, because there’s maybe a potential for voter fraud, and we’re trying to cut down on fraud.”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)InDepthNH reports the student-ID lawsuit and early reactionsStatements by Ben Horton, John Sellers and Alexis Simpson

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Sellers and Simpson assess New Hampshire student-ID restrictionsStatements by Ben Horton, John Sellers and Alexis Simpson
Red, white and blue curtains on voting booths at a Nashua polling station.
Credit: MarkBuckawicki

Where this statement fits

New Hampshire asks the Supreme Court to pause the student-ID ruling; challengers oppose the exclusion

New Hampshire asks the Supreme Court to pause an injunction allowing election officials to consider student IDs with other evidence of identity. The Coalition for Open Democracy, which brought the lawsuit, and its lawyers defend the injunction and continue challenging HB 323, the separate law removing student IDs from the list of accepted IDs.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Reporting

InDepthNH reports the student-ID lawsuit and early reactions (opens in a new tab)Statements by Ben Horton, John Sellers and Alexis Simpson

About this source

Zach Laird's original InDepthNH report, later distributed through AP, quotes the plaintiff's counsel, an HB 323 cosponsor and the House Democratic leader two days after the lawsuit was filed. Their claims about fraud, security and legality are attributed arguments.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Reporting

Sellers and Simpson assess New Hampshire student-ID restrictions (opens in a new tab)Statements by Ben Horton, John Sellers and Alexis Simpson

About this source

InDepthNH reporting distributed through AP quotes a bill sponsor, the House Democratic leader and litigation counsel. Their allegations about fraud and legality are attributed arguments.

Before the quotation

Sellers co-sponsored HB 323, which removed student IDs as accepted voter identification. Sellers told InDepthNH that a more secure government-issued ID for students would be preferable to school-issued IDs.

After the quotation

Sellers also cites making sure voters are domiciled in New Hampshire. The report adds that no evidence of widespread voter fraud in New Hampshire has been presented.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the state's categorical exclusion of student IDs from consideration under existing identity-verification safeguards, the rule in the April 23 directive that the district court blocked on October 2. Sellers, a cosponsor of HB 323, justifies "not allowing student IDs as valid identification cards" as a step against "a potential for voter fraud". When Sellers spoke in August, the directive applied the law as a complete bar on the cards, and the state later offered no separate justification for that bar beyond the law's own interests. We labeled it Defended or excused. Sellers does not address whether officials may consider the cards with other evidence. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, since Sellers hedges with "maybe"; it loses because the hedge qualifies the cited risk, not the support for the change.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Tentarelli supports considering student IDs with other evidence

Liz Tentarelli

“We at the League of Women Voters New Hampshire think this is a good ruling that student IDs should be considered in spite of the law passed last spring. ... It’s upsetting that this bill passed last spring ... But when it got extended by the Secretary of State to include voter registration, that was an assumption that was not spelled out in the bill”
Read statement

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: John Sellers, Sellers defends excluding student IDs to reduce possible fraudDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Sellers defends excluding student IDs to reduce possible fraud
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5934-sellers-says-the-change-to-stop-accepting-student

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Sellers defends excluding student IDs to reduce possible fraud". First published: 2026-10-18. Last updated: 2026-10-18. https://disputeindex.com/events/5934-sellers-says-the-change-to-stop-accepting-student