NetChoice and CCIA argue HB20 violates the First Amendment
NetChoiceTrade association challenging HB20, jointly with CCIA through counsel
NetChoice and CCIA argue that HB20 violates the First Amendment by compelling websites to distribute third-party speech and explain editorial decisions.
“Texas House Bill 20 (“HB20”) is an extraordinary assertion of governmental power over expression that violates the First Amendment in multiple ways.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
NetChoice challenges Florida and Texas social-media moderation laws
Florida and Texas enacted restrictions on social-media moderation in 2021. Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination law; NetChoice argues it compels private speech. The Supreme Court sent both cases back in 2024. The later rulings described here do not establish the laws' present enforceability.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
The trade associations contend that compelled distribution and individualized explanations interfere with private editorial discretion.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The brief challenges Texas's regulation of private websites and user content.
After the quotation
It argues that private refusal to publish is protected expression rather than government censorship.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The issue is HB20's restrictions on platform content moderation. NetChoice and CCIA argue that the Texas law violates their members' First Amendment rights, so this criticizes the restrictions.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseTexas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination law
“The Fifth Circuit correctly held, however, that HB20 regulates the platforms’ conduct, not their expression.”Read statement
Abbott signs HB20 and defends viewpoint protections
“proud to sign House Bill 20 into law to protect first amendment rights in the Lone Star State”Read statement
DeSantis signs Florida's moderation law and defends its protections
“If Big Tech censors enforce rules inconsistently, to discriminate in favor of the dominant Silicon Valley ideology, they will now be held accountable.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- NetChoice and CCIA argue HB20 violates the First Amendment
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5826-netchoice-and-ccia-argue-that-hb20-violates-the
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "NetChoice and CCIA argue HB20 violates the First Amendment". First published: 2026-10-16. Last updated: 2026-10-16. https://disputeindex.com/events/5826-netchoice-and-ccia-argue-that-hb20-violates-the