Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination law

Ken PaxtonTexas Attorney General, through counsel in his official capacity

Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination and disclosure law and disputes treating covered platform decisions as the platforms' own expression.

“The Fifth Circuit correctly held, however, that HB20 regulates the platforms’ conduct, not their expression.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Texas merits brief defending HB20 moderation restrictionsNo. 22-555, introduction, pages 1-4

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Supreme Court opinion in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. PaxtonNos. 22-277 and 22-555, syllabus and Kagan opinion
The Facebook app on an Android smartphone screen.
Credit: Tony Webster / CC BY 2.0

Where this statement fits

NetChoice challenges Florida and Texas social-media moderation laws

Florida and Texas enacted restrictions on social-media moderation in 2021. Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination law; NetChoice argues it compels private speech. The Supreme Court sent both cases back in 2024. The later rulings described here do not establish the laws' present enforceability.

Read the full case

Case updates

Want the next important update?

Follow this case and get an email when an important development changes the record.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

Texas merits brief defending HB20 moderation restrictions (opens in a new tab)No. 22-555, introduction, pages 1-4

About this source

Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination and disclosure law and disputes treating covered platform decisions as the platforms' own expression.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Original text

Supreme Court opinion in Moody v. NetChoice and NetChoice v. Paxton (opens in a new tab)Nos. 22-277 and 22-555, syllabus and Kagan opinion

About this source

The Court vacates and remands both judgments, requires proper facial-challenge analysis, and explains constitutional protection for editorial selection of expressive feeds.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Texas's brief says HB20 bars discrimination based on geography, association or viewpoint.

After the quotation

The brief presents the State's defense; the Supreme Court later vacated and remanded the appellate judgments.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The issue is Florida SB7072 and Texas HB20 restrictions on platform content moderation. Texas expressly defends the restrictions on platform moderation under scrutiny.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Ken Paxton, Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination lawDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination law
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5824-texas-defends-hb20-as-an-antidiscrimination-and-disclosure

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Texas defends HB20 as an antidiscrimination law". First published: 2026-10-16. Last updated: 2026-10-16. https://disputeindex.com/events/5824-texas-defends-hb20-as-an-antidiscrimination-and-disclosure