Kushner denies using diplomacy for private benefit
Jared KushnerAffinity Partners founder and volunteer diplomatic adviser, writing on his website
Kushner denied taking diplomatic action to benefit himself, Affinity or its investors. He also said investors had not influenced his positions.
“I have never taken a diplomatic action to benefit Affinity, myself, or any investor.”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Does Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners conflict with his role in Middle East negotiations, as congressional Democrats and ethics groups say?
Jared Kushner founded the investment firm Affinity Partners in January 2021. Since 2025 he has taken part in U.S. diplomatic talks on Gaza, Iran and Ukraine. Congressional Democrats, the ethics group CREW and other critics say the two roles conflict. They point to the firm's funding from foreign governments, its stakes in Israeli companies and reports that it sought new capital while he negotiated. Kushner, his lawyers, Affinity and the White House dispute that. A CNN investigation published October 1, 2026 reported that Affinity is the largest shareholder in the Israeli insurer Phoenix Financial, which holds stakes in companies that supply Israel's military, and that CNN found no indication his diplomacy directly affected the investments it reviewed. Kushner replied on October 2 that Phoenix is not a defense company and that he has no role in its investment decisions. The White House says he works on a volunteer basis. As of October 4, 2026, we did not find a ruling or finding on the question from a court, agency or committee, and we could not locate a response from Kushner to two letters from Rep. Jamie Raskin.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Kushner denies raising additional Affinity funds during Trump's second term and denies using diplomacy for private benefit. He says ethics counsel reviewed his role; the page does not provide those reviews.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
His rebuttal addressed reporting about fundraising and conflicts during his diplomatic role.
After the quotation
He said outside ethics counsel and the White House Counsel's Office confirmed compliance, without attaching the reviews.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
He explicitly denies the alleged private benefit from his diplomatic actions, rather than only defending the usefulness of business experience.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseMizelle defends Kushner's volunteer arrangement
“his arrangements comply with applicable ethics requirements”Read statement
Jeff Hauser says Kushner should face Senate confirmation and divest assets if he keeps his envoy role
“Jared Kushner has still not filed an updated financial disclosure ... I think that Kushner, if he is to continue serving as a roving Ambassador, should be appointed to an Ambassadorial or high ranking State Department job and stand for confirmation before the Senate. That would both give his work legal legitimacy as well as require him to divest assets that give him a different set of interests personally than the nation as a whole.”Read statement
Borelli disputes the conflict inference from Affinity's indirect defense investments
“small part”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Kushner denies using diplomacy for private benefit
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5383-kushner-denied-taking-diplomatic-action-to-benefit-himself
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Kushner denies using diplomacy for private benefit". First published: 2026-10-10. Last updated: 2026-10-10. https://disputeindex.com/events/5383-kushner-denied-taking-diplomatic-action-to-benefit-himself