Davidson calls Palantir and Flock an all-seeing eye network
Warren DavidsonU.S. representative from Ohio
Rep. Warren Davidson said in House floor remarks that Palantir and Flock have an all-seeing eye network expanding around the country, and compared their tools with those used in China and across Europe.
“And under the old ruse of security and public safety, Palantir and Flock have an all-seeing eye network expanding around the country. These are the same types of tools used in China, and the same tools developed by the same companies, in use across Europe.”
Official statement
Where this statement fits
Should Flock-style license-plate surveillance networks exist?
Networked automated license-plate readers record passing vehicles and let agencies search or share travel records across locations. Candidates and officials disagree over whether to prohibit these networks, keep them with legal limits, or defend their use for investigations. This tracker records attributable positions on that choice, including proposals that would affect only public funding or data access.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Release from Rep. Warren Davidson's office with his House floor remarks of July 20, 2026, as prepared for delivery, on censorship and surveillance in China, Europe and the United States. One passage names Palantir and Flock.
Before the quotation
Davidson's office published his House floor remarks, as prepared for delivery, on censorship and surveillance in China, Europe and the United States. The passage follows his criticism of a digital ID bill and of central bank digital currency.
After the quotation
He then cited Federalist No. 51 and past abuses of the Patriot Act and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and said a comprehensive system of surveillance and control is being built.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether networked license-plate reader systems such as Flock should exist and be used. Davidson says Flock's network expanded under the ruse of security and public safety and likens it to surveillance tools used in China, which fits Condemns.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Flock Safety
More from this case
Read the full caseNanette Barragán says the lack of federal limits on plate-reader data "is not acceptable"
“Right now, there are few meaningful federal limits on how this kind of data is collected, stored, or shared. There is also a failure to hold companies accountable or put strict rules in place on the use and collection of data. That is not acceptable. When there are no real limits on who can access this data, it becomes easier for agencies like ICE to use it against immigrant families and working communities, the very people our public safety systems should be protecting, not putting at risk. This is about more than privacy. It is about whether people can go to work, visit a doctor, or move through their communities without being tracked and having that information used against them. We can have public safety and privacy. What we cannot have is a surveillance state that tracks people without accountability, and I will keep pushing in Congress to close that gap.”Read statement
Robert Murray asks to move his Flock position to "Ban or remove"
“Please change my answer to "Ban or remove"”Read statement
Delegate May Nivar welcomes Henrico and Goochland moving away from Flock and calls for safeguards
“I’m encouraged that Henrico and Goochland have each decided to move away from Flock cameras after hearing residents’ concerns about privacy and accountability. Public safety and privacy are not competing values. Law enforcement needs effective tools, but those tools must be used responsibly and with appropriate safeguards. ... As the General Assembly revisits this issue next session, we must work toward the right balance between public safety, privacy, accountability, and the authority of local communities to make decisions that reflect their residents’ values.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Davidson calls Palantir and Flock an all-seeing eye network
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5195-rep-warren-davidson-said-in-house-floor-remarks
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Davidson calls Palantir and Flock an all-seeing eye network". First published: 2026-10-07. Last updated: 2026-10-07. https://disputeindex.com/events/5195-rep-warren-davidson-said-in-house-floor-remarks