America First Legal supports the FCC's authority and rejects retaliation

America First LegalAmicus organization and counsel for viewers petitioning against renewal

AFL argues that the FCC acted within its authority and that the discrimination inquiry warrants review.

Responding to

Early renewal is an authorized part of the FCC's employment-discrimination inquiry, rather than retaliation for programming.

“This was not retaliation but rather the exercise of a congressionally delegated FCC authority.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)America First Legal's brief supporting the FCC in ABC's lawsuit · America First LegalMotion and attached amicus brief submitted September 16; brief docketed September 17, 2026; introduction, printed pages 3-4
Brendan Carr beside the ABC network logo.
Credit: Federal Communications Commission; ABC Entertainment

Where this statement fits

Is the FCC's early review of ABC's broadcast licenses legitimate oversight or retaliation?

The FCC called eight ABC-owned television station licenses for early renewal in April 2026. Disney alleges retaliation for protected programming. The FCC and America First Legal defend the review as lawful oversight, while press-freedom groups and Anna Gomez oppose it. The lawsuit also disputes whether the district court can intervene before a final FCC decision.

Read the full case

Case updates

What to follow

The district court's jurisdiction and injunction decisions, and any FCC action on the eight renewal applications.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Original text

America First Legal's brief supporting the FCC in ABC's lawsuit (opens in a new tab) · America First LegalMotion and attached amicus brief submitted September 16; brief docketed September 17, 2026; introduction, printed pages 3-4

About this source

AFL argues that the FCC used lawful authority, rejects the retaliation account and opposes an injunction. It also represents viewers petitioning against renewal.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

AFL had petitioned against renewal on behalf of viewers alleging employment-rule violations.

After the quotation

Its brief also challenges district-court jurisdiction and says an injunction would prevent consideration of those petitions.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The brief defends the challenged review on its merits, not just the government's preferred court procedure.

Recorded on
Published here
People and groups discussed
Federal Communications Commission, The Walt Disney Company

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
America First Legal supports the FCC's authority and rejects retaliation
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/5179-afl-argues-that-the-fcc-acted-within-its

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "America First Legal supports the FCC's authority and rejects retaliation". First published: 2026-10-07. Last updated: 2026-10-07. https://disputeindex.com/events/5179-afl-argues-that-the-fcc-acted-within-its