Cherkin presses Seattle schools for protective changes
Emily CherkinAuthor, education-technology advocate and former teacher
Cherkin criticizes Google's approach to school-device risks and asks Seattle school leaders to disable YouTube and Gemini and reassess education technology.
“companies like Google will shift the legal risks of its products to school districts ... technology companies need children to be profitable”
Original text
Where this statement fits
Should Google bear responsibility for harmful content children access on school-issued Chromebooks?
An October 5 open letter asks school districts to disable YouTube and Gemini and reassess student internet access. It criticizes Google's approach to safety and responsibility. Google's earlier court filings defend its products and dispute liability for third-party content and school configuration choices.
Source and context
Original text
About this source
Cherkin explains her participation in the joint letter and publishes her own request to Seattle school leaders. Her prediction about legal risk is advocacy, not a determination of district liability.
Before the quotation
Cherkin explains why she joined the October 5 letter and sent it to her local district.
After the quotation
She requests changes to district policy and forecasts legal risks. Those forecasts are her argument, not a ruling about Seattle's obligations.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
The reference point is whether Google should bear responsibility for harmful content children access on school-issued Chromebooks. Cherkin writes that "companies like Google will shift the legal risks of its products to school districts" and asks Seattle school leaders to disable YouTube and Gemini, which condemns the approach. This is a distinct message by a signer of the joint letter. The closest competing label is Mixed or conditional, but she states the criticism without qualification.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Google LLC
More from this case
Read the full caseFairplay signs the school-device safety letter
Fairplay
“Google is looking out for its own interests.”Read statement
Nhando argues against immunity for first-party design choices
“It should not immunize platforms for what they themselves say, nor for the design decisions they themselves make. ... A company that markets Chromebooks as simple, powerful, and secure for US schoolchildren may have built that technology without adequate child safety as any part of the design equation as a calculation, not an oversight.”Read statement
Google defends administrator controls and disputes M.C. liability
Google LLC
“This lawsuit is a misuse of California tort law in an attempt to undermine educators' decision to use Google's technology as part of their schools' curricula. ... all of which seek to hold Google liable for the third-party content that M.C. encountered while using his school-issued Chromebook”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Cherkin presses Seattle schools for protective changes
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/5094-cherkin-criticizes-google-s-approach-to-school-device
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Cherkin presses Seattle schools for protective changes". First published: 2026-10-07. Last updated: 2026-10-07. https://disputeindex.com/events/5094-cherkin-criticizes-google-s-approach-to-school-device