Mamdani defends revenue from the second-home surcharge
Zohran MamdaniMayor of New York City
Mamdani defends the tax as a way to raise money for city services without shifting the burden onto working New Yorkers.
“collecting critical revenue to fund our parks, schools and libraries”
Official statement

Where this statement fits
Should New York impose its pied-a-terre tax on New York City second homes?
Wilbur Ross, Hilary Geary Ross and Steve Wynn sued New York State on September 28, 2026, arguing that the new pied-a-terre surcharge unconstitutionally burdens nonresidents who already pay property taxes. Mayor Zohran Mamdani and Governor Kathy Hochul defend additional contributions from wealthy second-home owners to fund city services. The disagreement concerns both the fairness of the surcharge and the constitutional limits on imposing it.
Source and context
Official statement
About this source
Mamdani defends collecting revenue for parks, schools and libraries while announcing the start of notifications.
Archived copy (opens in a new tab)Before the quotation
The mayor announces that property owners are receiving initial notifications.
After the quotation
He commits to implementing the law and collecting the revenue.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
He expressly supports imposing and collecting the surcharge.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseHochul says Ross and Wynn strengthen the case for the tax
“they make the case for the pied-à-terre tax better than we ever could.”Read statement
Hilary Geary Ross joins the challenge to the second-home tax
“These nonresidents, including Plaintiffs herein, already pay significant sums to the City in property taxes, the same taxes at the same rates paid by New York City residents occupying similarly assessed residential properties.”Read statement
Wynn seeks to invalidate the surcharge
“Article 30-C is therefore unconstitutional to the extent it purports to exclude PAT Tax revenues from the amount raised by tax on real estate for purposes of Article VIII, § 10(e).”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Mamdani defends revenue from the second-home surcharge
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4909-mamdani-defends-the-tax-as-a-way-to
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Mamdani defends revenue from the second-home surcharge". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4909-mamdani-defends-the-tax-as-a-way-to