Kushner's lawyer says no critic "has identified a single applicable rule or regulation he has violated"

Chad MizelleLawyer for Jared Kushner, in a statement quoted by Reuters

In a statement quoted by Reuters on September 28, 2026, Chad Mizelle, a lawyer for Kushner, said the allegations against Kushner are false and that "to date, no one" including Kushner's critics "has identified a single applicable rule or regulation he has violated".

Responding to

Jared Kushner's simultaneous roles as Special Envoy for Peace and chief executive of Affinity Partners, which has raised billions of dollars from Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, create a glaring and incurable conflict of interest.

“And to date, no one — not even Jared’s critics — has identified a single applicable rule or regulation he has violated”

Reporting

Open source (opens in a new tab)Democrats to probe lucrative Trump family business deals if they win midterms (Reuters, September 28, 2026) · ReutersParagraphs on Rep. Jamie Raskin and Chad Mizelle
A close-up portrait of Jared Kushner in a dark suit and white shirt, looking to the left in front of a colorful painting.
Credit: U.S. Embassy Jerusalem

Where this statement fits

Does Jared Kushner's Affinity Partners conflict with his role in Middle East negotiations, as congressional Democrats and ethics groups say?

Jared Kushner founded the investment firm Affinity Partners in January 2021. Since 2025 he has taken part in U.S. diplomatic talks on Gaza, Iran and Ukraine. Congressional Democrats, the ethics group CREW and other critics say the two roles conflict. They point to the firm's funding from foreign governments, its stakes in Israeli companies and reports that it sought new capital while he negotiated. Kushner, his lawyers, Affinity and the White House dispute that. A CNN investigation published October 1, 2026 reported that Affinity is the largest shareholder in the Israeli insurer Phoenix Financial, which holds stakes in companies that supply Israel's military, and that CNN found no indication his diplomacy directly affected the investments it reviewed. Kushner replied on October 2 that Phoenix is not a defense company and that he has no role in its investment decisions. The White House says he works on a volunteer basis. As of October 4, 2026, we did not find a ruling or finding on the question from a court, agency or committee, and we could not locate a response from Kushner to two letters from Rep. Jamie Raskin.

Read the full case

Source and context

Reporting

Democrats to probe lucrative Trump family business deals if they win midterms (Reuters, September 28, 2026) (opens in a new tab) · ReutersParagraphs on Rep. Jamie Raskin and Chad Mizelle

About this source

A Reuters report, published here by The Spokesman-Review, on Democratic plans for investigations of Trump family businesses if the party wins control of a chamber in the November 3, 2026 midterms. It quotes Rep. Raskin on Kushner and a statement from Kushner's lawyer Chad Mizelle. It describes Kushner as 'a US special envoy for peace but not a government employee.'

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

Reuters was reporting on Democratic plans to investigate Trump family businesses if the party wins control of a chamber in the November 3 midterms. Raskin told Reuters that Kushner has not responded to two letters and called the deals Kushner secured with Saudi Arabia, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates "an outrageous conflict of interest."

After the quotation

Reuters describes Kushner as "a US special envoy for peace but not a government employee." As of October 4, 2026, we did not find a finding by an agency or court on whether any rule applies to him.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is the proposition that Kushner's private business through Affinity, including its Israeli investments and Gulf capital, creates a conflict of interest with his role in U.S. Middle East negotiations. Mizelle argues that no applicable rule has been shown to be violated, which defends the arrangement as compliant, so we used Defended or excused. The closest competing label is Denied, because Reuters also reports that he called the allegations false. It loses because the quoted words argue about rules and do not deny a specific alleged fact.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Kushner says "Phoenix is not a defense company" and that he has "no role in deciding what Phoenix buys or sells"

Jared Kushner

“CNN published a deeply misleading story and headline suggesting that my diplomatic work in the Middle East somehow benefited investments in Israeli defense companies. But CNN’s own reporting says otherwise. Buried behind a paywall, it acknowledges: “CNN found no indication that Kushner’s actions as a diplomat directly affected the investments reviewed.” Phoenix is not a defense company. It is one of Israel’s largest publicly traded financial institutions, highly regulated and managing approximately $220 billion across thousands of investments. Think of Phoenix as the Israeli equivalent of Vanguard or Fidelity. It manages the retirement savings of millions of Israelis. The savers don’t choose the individual investments, and neither do I. I have no role in deciding what Phoenix buys or sells. It has performed very well for Affinity and our investors, up more than five times since our initial investment. Affinity is an SEC-registered investment firm. Our investment in Phoenix is public and dates to before President Trump was re-elected and before I returned to public service. Affinity does not own the defense companies highlighted in CNN’s story. Those facts make for a less provocative headline, but a much more accurate story. Misleading stories will not distract me from the work President Trump asked me to do: help end wars, bring people together and pursue peace. That work is too important.”
Read statement

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Kushner's lawyer says no critic "has identified a single applicable rule or regulation he has violated"
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4573-in-a-statement-quoted-by-reuters-on-september

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Kushner's lawyer says no critic "has identified a single applicable rule or regulation he has violated"". First published: 2026-10-05. Last updated: 2026-10-05. https://disputeindex.com/events/4573-in-a-statement-quoted-by-reuters-on-september