Mace accepts Loomer's national-security premise in a direct reply
Nancy MaceU.S. representative from South Carolina, commenting on her personal X account
Nancy Mace responds to Loomer's allegation about Mamdani's clearance and possible terrorist contacts by asking why he is still here. Her question accepts Loomer's national-security concern as a reason to challenge Mamdani's continued presence.
Responding to
The FBI denied Zohran Mamdani a security clearance because of possible direct communication with terrorist organizations and would not grant him one.
“Then why the hell is he still here?”
Original post
Where this statement fits
Did the FBI deny Mamdani a clearance over terrorist contacts, as Loomer claimed?
Laura Loomer alleged in July that a senior FBI source had told her Zohran Mamdani was denied a security clearance over possible terrorist contacts and would not receive one. Mamdani announced on September 30 that he had his clearance. Loomer then questioned the approval and repeated allegations about terrorist ties.
Source and context
Original post
About this source
Mace asks why Mamdani is still here in a reply to Loomer's allegation that an FBI source described him as a national security risk and said his clearance had been denied. Loomer replies on July 23 that this is what they all want to know.
Before the quotation
Loomer alleges that an unnamed FBI source told her Mamdani was a national security risk because of possible terrorist contacts and had been denied a security clearance.
After the quotation
Loomer replies the next day that this is what they all want to know.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
Mace's reply treats the allegation as a basis for questioning Mamdani's continued presence, supporting rather than disputing Loomer's characterization. It is not an independent account of an FBI decision.
- Recorded on
- Published here
- People and groups discussed
- Laura Loomer, Zohran Mamdani
More from this case
Read the full caseRAIR Foundation says Mamdani's clearance should have been denied over terrorist ties
RAIR Foundation USA
“It’s unthinkable that such a stone-cold national security threat would be given access to classified intel when he has deep doumented terrorist ties and has deeper allegiances with our enemies than America herself.”Read statement
Laura Loomer repeats her FBI-source allegation after Mamdani's clearance announcement
“Did you really sign off on this”Read statement
Laura Loomer says the FBI knows of terrorist ties blocking Mamdani's clearance
“Mamdani can’t pass a background check for a federal security clearance like most mayors of major US cities because the FBI knows Mamdani has ties to Islamic terrorists.”Read statement
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Mace accepts Loomer's national-security premise in a direct reply
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4483-nancy-mace-responds-to-loomer-s-allegation-about
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Mace accepts Loomer's national-security premise in a direct reply". First published: 2026-10-03. Last updated: 2026-10-03. https://disputeindex.com/events/4483-nancy-mace-responds-to-loomer-s-allegation-about