RAIR Foundation says Mamdani's clearance should have been denied over terrorist ties

RAIR Foundation USAActivist and investigative news organization, in an article by Terresa Monroe-Hamilton

After Mamdani announced his clearance, RAIR Foundation USA published an article saying he had documented terrorist ties and that the clearance should have been denied.

“It’s unthinkable that such a stone-cold national security threat would be given access to classified intel when he has deep doumented terrorist ties and has deeper allegiances with our enemies than America herself.”

Analysis

Open source (opens in a new tab)INSANITY: National Security Threat Muslim Communist Zohran Mamdani Receives Federal Security Clearance · RAIR Foundation USAArticle standfirst and section "A Security Clearance that Should Have Been Denied"
Zohran Mamdani and Laura Loomer flank a photograph of FBI headquarters.
Credit: Dmitryshein; Federal Bureau of Investigation; Gage Skidmore

Where this statement fits

Did the FBI deny Mamdani a clearance over terrorist contacts, as Loomer claimed?

Laura Loomer alleged in July that a senior FBI source had told her Zohran Mamdani was denied a security clearance over possible terrorist contacts and would not receive one. Mamdani announced on September 30 that he had his clearance. Loomer then questioned the approval and repeated allegations about terrorist ties.

Read the full case

Case updates

New facts on Loomer's claim about Mamdani's clearance?

Get an email if the FBI, Kash Patel or City Hall says more about the clearance, or if Loomer publishes support for her allegations.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

Source and context

Analysis

INSANITY: National Security Threat Muslim Communist Zohran Mamdani Receives Federal Security Clearance (opens in a new tab) · RAIR Foundation USAArticle standfirst and section "A Security Clearance that Should Have Been Denied"

About this source

Opinion article published by RAIR Foundation USA after Mamdani announced his clearance. It argues the clearance should have been denied and asserts terrorist ties. The same article was also posted to RAIR's Substack.

Archived copy (opens in a new tab)

Before the quotation

The article opened by reporting that Mamdani had received his federal security clearance that week.

After the quotation

It called the decision suicidal insanity and later argued under a heading that the clearance should have been denied.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

The reference point is Loomer's allegation that the FBI denied Mamdani a clearance over terrorist contacts. The article does not address whether a denial occurred and cites a GAO finding that the delay was normal; it asserts terrorist ties as the reason the clearance should have been refused. That supports the basis Loomer gave for her claim. Challenged the characterization does not fit because the article disputes nothing in her account. Evidence: the organization's own article.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
RAIR Foundation says Mamdani's clearance should have been denied over terrorist ties
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4818-after-mamdani-announced-his-clearance-rair-foundation-usa

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "RAIR Foundation says Mamdani's clearance should have been denied over terrorist ties". First published: 2026-10-06. Last updated: 2026-10-06. https://disputeindex.com/events/4818-after-mamdani-announced-his-clearance-rair-foundation-usa