Romano defends the toll-record collection as routine investigative work

Michael J. RomanoFormer federal prosecutor testifying to the Senate Judiciary Committee

Defended or excused

Romano says the toll-record subpoenas and nondisclosure orders were appropriate investigative tools. He argues that Smith's office followed Justice Department policy and did not use the records to harm the senators.

“This collection of toll records was not weaponization.”

Original text

Read the original text (opens in a new tab)Statement of Michael J. Romano, Former Deputy Chief, Capitol Siege Section, before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, February 10, 2026Page 1, paragraphs on toll records and nondisclosure orders

Case updates

Following the fight over members' phone records in Arctic Frost?

Get an email if Blackburn's lawsuit or Hagerty's bar complaint produces a ruling, if the Senate acts on subpoena-notice rules, or if Smith responds.

Important updates only. Free. Confirm your email to start. Unsubscribe anytime. How we handle your email.

The Hart Senate Office Building in Washington, D.C., photographed from across a street on a clear day.
Credit: Architect of the Capitol

Where this statement fits

Were members of Congress's phone records and text messages properly obtained in the Arctic Frost and Jack Smith investigations?

On September 29, 2026, the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing titled "Oversight of Jack Smith's Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans and Related Matters," with former special counsel Jack Smith as its only witness. Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) and other Republicans said that Smith's team, in the FBI's Arctic Frost investigation and its own election case, obtained members of Congress's phone toll records and text messages, used nondisclosure orders to keep members from learning of it, and breached the Speech or Debate Clause. Smith said the toll records were non-content records obtained after he directed his staff to consult the Justice Department's Public Integrity Section, and that the nondisclosure orders were consistent with the law and Justice Department policy at the time. Ranking Member Dick Durbin (D-IL) called the attacks on Smith "petty, personal, and political." The sides and the documents give different counts of the members affected. The dispute is whether the collection of members' phone records and messages was proper.

Read the full case

Source and context

Original text

Statement of Michael J. Romano, Former Deputy Chief, Capitol Siege Section, before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary, February 10, 2026 (opens in a new tab)Page 1, paragraphs on toll records and nondisclosure orders

About this source

Written testimony by Michael Romano, a former deputy chief of the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia's Capitol Siege Section, on toll records and nondisclosure orders in criminal investigations.

Before the quotation

Romano testified about the use of toll-record subpoenas and nondisclosure orders.

After the quotation

He argued that these were legitimate investigative tools consistent with department policy.

How this statement is classified

Defended or excused

The label describes this statement's response within the context above.

Why this label?

He justifies the investigative conduct at the center of the case.

Recorded on
Published here

More from this case

Read the full case

Share or embed this statement

Quote card: Michael J. Romano, Romano defends the toll-record collection as routine investigative workDownload image (PNG)

The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.

Cite this record

Publisher
The Dispute Index
Title
Romano defends the toll-record collection as routine investigative work
First published
Last updated
Permalink
https://disputeindex.com/events/4356-romano-says-the-toll-record-subpoenas-and-nondisclosure

Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.

The Dispute Index. "Romano defends the toll-record collection as routine investigative work". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4356-romano-says-the-toll-record-subpoenas-and-nondisclosure