Barrett withholds a verdict on whether the Meriden arrest violated state law
Dan BarrettACLU of Connecticut legal director
Barrett said ICE presented an administrative warrant, not a signed judicial warrant. He withheld a conclusion while seeking more records and said lawmakers might need to broaden the protections.
“to figure out if our law was violated here”
Reporting

Where this statement fits
Did ICE's conduct at the Meriden, Connecticut, courthouse violate the state's TRUST Act?
On September 23, 2026, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents, some wearing face coverings, entered a courthouse in Meriden, Connecticut, and took Welington Leonel Almara-Diaz into custody. Activists confronted the agents outside the courthouse entrance, asking why they were violating the state's TRUST Act, which limits immigration enforcement at Connecticut courthouses; sources disagree on whether the law's separate ban on masked law enforcement was already in effect that day. Judicial marshals moved activists away from the entrance; one woman was pepper-sprayed and another fell and was taken to a hospital by ambulance, though sources also disagree on who pushed her. The Connecticut Judicial Branch confirmed marshals had received a warrant of removal or deportation before the arrest and said it was reviewing whether state law was followed. ICE said the arrest was appropriate because Almara-Diaz had a 2023 removal order, and said judicial marshals impeded the arrest; the Judicial Branch later said its review did not support that. State officials, including Attorney General William Tong and Governor Ned Lamont's office, said ICE's conduct at the courthouse was improper. The dispute is whether ICE's conduct at the courthouse, including its use of face coverings and how the operation and marshals' cooperation with it were carried out, complied with the TRUST Act.
Source and context
Reporting
About this source
Reporting includes attributed statements and a chronology of the events.
Before the quotation
Barrett discussed records obtained about the Meriden courthouse arrest.
After the quotation
He sought further evidence about exceptions to the TRUST Act before reaching a conclusion.
How this statement is classified
The label describes this statement's response within the context above.
Why this label?
He withholds a verdict on compliance while questioning the warrant's significance.
- Recorded on
- Published here
More from this case
Read the full caseStafstrom calls for further protections after the Meriden arrest
“an abusive, scandal-ridden and frankly destabilizing force”Read statement
Hands Off Connecticut calls the marshals' cooperation with ICE "an unforgivable act of collaboration"
Hands Off Connecticut
“When federal agents barged into the state courthouse in Meriden, they did not just abduct another community member, they fundamentally challenged the legitimacy of our state government. Marshals opened the doors wide for ICE while pushing the citizens out of their own courthouse. ICE went so far as to pepper spray bystanders and a marshal assaulted another, causing one to be taken from the court by ambulance to the ER. This is an unforgivable act of collaboration, for which we demand justice.”Read statement
Looney says FBI and ATF agents "do not wear masks"
“The agency operating ICE inherently understands that some of what they’re doing is shameful, and that’s why they don’t want to be identified. It’s an extraordinary thing for people engaged in law enforcement to think they have to remain anonymous. It means that they don’t have confidence in the morality of their own mission. FBI agents do not wear masks. ATF agents — they don’t wear masks, either. Federal marshals who protect courthouses — they don’t wear masks.”Read statement
Share or embed this statement
The embed keeps its attribution link to The Dispute Index. Credit the image to The Dispute Index and link to the statement page.
Cite this record
- Publisher
- The Dispute Index
- Title
- Barrett withholds a verdict on whether the Meriden arrest violated state law
- First published
- Last updated
- Permalink
- https://disputeindex.com/events/4343-barrett-said-ice-presented-an-administrative-warrant-not
Last updated marks the most recent saved version of this published statement.
The Dispute Index. "Barrett withholds a verdict on whether the Meriden arrest violated state law". First published: 2026-10-01. Last updated: 2026-10-01. https://disputeindex.com/events/4343-barrett-said-ice-presented-an-administrative-warrant-not